IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i1p141-d310834.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Rectifying Acceptance Sampling Plan Based on the Process Capability Index

Author

Listed:
  • Ching-Ho Yen

    (Department of Industrial Engineering & Management Information, Huafan University, New Taipei City 223, Taiwan)

  • Chun-Chia Lee

    (School of Business, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou 363000, China)

  • Kuo-Hung Lo

    (Department of Economic & Statistics, Fujian Business University, Fuzhou 350016, China)

  • Yeou-Ren Shiue

    (Department of Management Engineering, Fujian Business University, Fuzhou 350016, China)

  • Shu-Hua Li

    (Graduate Institute of Technology, Innovation and Intellectual Property Management, College of Commerce, National Cheng-chi University, Taipei City 116, Taiwan)

Abstract

The acceptance sampling plan and process capability index (PCI) are critical decision tools for quality control. Recently, numerous research papers have examined the acceptance sampling plan in combination with the PCI. However, most of these papers have not considered the aspect of rectifying inspections. In this paper, we propose a quality cost model of repetitive sampling to develop a rectifying acceptance sampling plan based on the one-sided PCI. This proposed model minimizes the total quality cost (TQC) of sentencing one lot, including inspection cost, internal failure cost, and external failure cost. In addition, sensitivity analysis is conducted to investigate the behavior of relevant parameters against TQC. To demonstrate the advantages of the proposed methodology, a comparison is implemented with the existing rectifying sampling plan in terms of TQC and average outgoing quality limit. This comparison reveals that our proposed methodology exhibits superior performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Ching-Ho Yen & Chun-Chia Lee & Kuo-Hung Lo & Yeou-Ren Shiue & Shu-Hua Li, 2020. "A Rectifying Acceptance Sampling Plan Based on the Process Capability Index," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:141-:d:310834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/1/141/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/1/141/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amy Lee & Chien-Wei Wu & Yen-Wen Chen, 2016. "A modified variables repetitive group sampling plan with the consideration of preceding lots information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 355-373, March.
    2. Amy H. I. Lee & Chien-Wei Wu & Yen-Wen Chen, 2016. "A modified variables repetitive group sampling plan with the consideration of preceding lots information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 355-373, March.
    3. Ching-Ho Yen & Chia-Hao Chang & Muhammad Aslam & Chi-Hyuck Jun, 2018. "Multiple dependent state repetitive sampling plans based on one-sided process capability indices," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(6), pages 1403-1412, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Aslam & Gadde Srinivasa Rao & Mohammed Albassam, 2022. "Sampling Inspection Plan to Test Daily COVID-19 Cases Using Gamma Distribution under Indeterminacy Based on Multiple Dependent Scheme," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-14, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chien-Wei Wu & Ming-Hung Shu & Pei-An Wang & Bi-Min Hsu, 2021. "Variables skip-lot sampling plans on the basis of process capability index for products with a low fraction of defectives," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1391-1413, June.
    2. Chien-Wei Wu & Armin Darmawan & Nien-Yun Wu, 2024. "A double sampling plan for truncated life tests under two-parameter Lindley distribution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(1), pages 619-641, September.
    3. Kuen-Suan Chen & Chun-Min Yu & Tsang-Chuan Chang & Hsuan-Yu Chen, 2024. "Fuzzy evaluation of product reliability based on ratio-based lifetime performance index," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(1), pages 163-180, September.
    4. Shih-Wen Liu & Chien-Wei Wu, 2024. "An efficient partial sampling inspection for lot sentencing based on process yield," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(1), pages 325-344, September.
    5. Kuen-Suan Chen & Tsang-Chuan Chang, 2022. "Fuzzy testing model for the lifetime performance of products under consideration with exponential distribution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(1), pages 87-98, May.
    6. To-Cheng Wang & Chien-Wei Wu & Ming-Hung Shu, 2022. "A variables-type multiple-dependent-state sampling plan based on the lifetime performance index under a Weibull distribution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 381-399, April.
    7. Gadde Srinivasa Rao & S. D. Jilani & A. Vasudeva Rao, 2021. "Designing of multiple dependent state repetitive sampling plan for type-II generalized half logistic distribution," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(6), pages 1397-1409, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:141-:d:310834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.