IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i12p2138-d454513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Smaller Number of Inputs for Determining User Preferences in Recommender Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Sang-Min Choi

    (Department of Computer Science, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea)

  • Dongwoo Lee

    (R&D, Weddell Inc., Seoul 06168, Korea)

  • Chihyun Park

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
    Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Medical Bigdata Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea)

Abstract

One of the most popular applications for the recommender systems is a movie recommendation system that suggests a few movies to a user based on the user’s preferences. Although there is a wealth of available data on movies, such as their genres, directors and actors, there is little information on a new user, making it hard for the recommender system to suggest what might interest the user. Accordingly, several recommendation services explicitly ask users to evaluate a certain number of movies, which are then used to create a user profile in the system. In general, one can create a better user profile if the user evaluates many movies at the beginning. However, most users do not want to evaluate many movies when they join the service. This motivates us to examine the minimum number of inputs needed to create a reliable user preference. We call this the magic number for determining user preferences. A recommender system based on this magic number can reduce user inconvenience while also making reliable suggestions. Based on user, item and content-based filtering, we calculate the magic number by comparing the accuracy resulting from the use of different numbers for predicting user preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Sang-Min Choi & Dongwoo Lee & Chihyun Park, 2020. "On the Smaller Number of Inputs for Determining User Preferences in Recommender Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-32, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:12:p:2138-:d:454513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/12/2138/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/12/2138/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:12:p:2138-:d:454513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.