IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i10p1657-d419638.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Definition and Estimation of Covariate Effect Types in the Context of Treatment Effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Yasutaka Chiba

    (Clinical Research Center, Kindai University Hospital, 377-2, Ohno-higashi, Osaka-sayama, Osaka 589–8511, Japan)

Abstract

In some clinical studies, assessing covariate effect types indicating whether a covariate is predictive and/or prognostic is of interest, in addition to the study endpoint. Recently, for a case with a binary outcome, Chiba (Clinical Trials, 2019; 16: 237–245) proposed the new concept of covariate effect type, which is assessed in terms of four response types, and showed that standard subgroup or regression analysis is applicable only in certain cases. Although this concept could be useful for supplementing conventional standard analysis, its application is limited to cases with a binary outcome. In this article, we aim to generalize Chiba’s concept to continuous and time-to-event outcomes. We define covariate effect types based on four response types. It is difficult to estimate the response types from the observed data without making certain assumptions, so we propose a simple method to estimate them under the assumption of independent potential outcomes. Our approach is illustrated using data from a clinical study with a time-to-event outcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Yasutaka Chiba, 2020. "Definition and Estimation of Covariate Effect Types in the Context of Treatment Effectiveness," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-11, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:10:p:1657-:d:419638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/10/1657/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/10/1657/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng Ding & Tirthankar Dasgupta, 2016. "A Potential Tale of Two-by-Two Tables From Completely Randomized Experiments," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(513), pages 157-168, March.
    2. Patrick J. Heagerty & Thomas Lumley & Margaret S. Pepe, 2000. "Time-Dependent ROC Curves for Censored Survival Data and a Diagnostic Marker," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 337-344, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiannan Lu & Peng Ding & Tirthankar Dasgupta, 2018. "Treatment Effects on Ordinal Outcomes: Causal Estimands and Sharp Bounds," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(5), pages 540-567, October.
    2. Claire L Heslop & Gregory E Miller & John S Hill, 2009. "Neighbourhood Socioeconomics Status Predicts Non-Cardiovascular Mortality in Cardiac Patients with Access to Universal Health Care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(1), pages 1-8, January.
    3. Chin-Tsang Chiang & Shr-Yan Huang, 2009. "Estimation for the Optimal Combination of Markers without Modeling the Censoring Distribution," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 152-158, March.
    4. Sebastian Cremer & Lisa Pilgram & Alexander Berkowitsch & Melanie Stecher & Siegbert Rieg & Mariana Shumliakivska & Denisa Bojkova & Julian Uwe Gabriel Wagner & Galip Servet Aslan & Christoph Spinner , 2021. "Angiotensin II receptor blocker intake associates with reduced markers of inflammatory activation and decreased mortality in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities and COVID-19 disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Te-Ling Ma & Tsung-Hui Hu & Chao-Hung Hung & Jing-Houng Wang & Sheng-Nan Lu & Chien-Hung Chen, 2019. "Incidence and predictors of retreatment in chronic hepatitis B patients after discontinuation of entecavir or tenofovir treatment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Liu Xinhua & Jin Zhezhen, 2009. "A Non-Parametric Approach to Scale Reduction for Uni-Dimensional Screening Scales," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Yingye Zheng & Patrick Heagerty, 2004. "Semiparametric Estimation of Time-Dependent: ROC Curves for Longitudinal Marker Data," UW Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1052, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    8. Shannon M Lynch & Elizabeth Handorf & Kristen A Sorice & Elizabeth Blackman & Lisa Bealin & Veda N Giri & Elias Obeid & Camille Ragin & Mary Daly, 2020. "The effect of neighborhood social environment on prostate cancer development in black and white men at high risk for prostate cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Nir Y. Krakauer & Jesse C. Krakauer, 2021. "Association of X-ray Absorptiometry Body Composition Measurements with Basic Anthropometrics and Mortality Hazard," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-13, July.
    10. Weining Shen & Jing Ning & Ying Yuan, 2015. "A direct method to evaluate the time-dependent predictive accuracy for biomarkers," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 439-449, June.
    11. Matthias Schmid & Thomas Hielscher & Thomas Augustin & Olaf Gefeller, 2011. "A Robust Alternative to the Schemper–Henderson Estimator of Prediction Error," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 524-535, June.
    12. Si Cheng & Kathleen F Kerr & Heather Thiessen-Philbrook & Steven G Coca & Chirag R Parikh, 2020. "BioPETsurv: Methodology and open source software to evaluate biomarkers for prognostic enrichment of time-to-event clinical trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-11, September.
    13. Tim Johnson & Valen Johnson, 2004. "A Bayesian Hierarchical Approach to Multirater Correlated ROC Analysis," The University of Michigan Department of Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1027, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    14. P. Saha & P. J. Heagerty, 2010. "Time-Dependent Predictive Accuracy in the Presence of Competing Risks," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 999-1011, December.
    15. Lori E. Dodd, 2010. "ROC Curves for Continuous Data by KRZANOWSKI, W. J. and HAND, D. J," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 657-658, June.
    16. Janez Stare & Maja Pohar Perme & Robin Henderson, 2011. "A Measure of Explained Variation for Event History Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(3), pages 750-759, September.
    17. Minta Thomas & Yu-Ru Su & Elisabeth A. Rosenthal & Lori C. Sakoda & Stephanie L. Schmit & Maria N. Timofeeva & Zhishan Chen & Ceres Fernandez-Rozadilla & Philip J. Law & Neil Murphy & Robert Carreras-, 2023. "Combining Asian and European genome-wide association studies of colorectal cancer improves risk prediction across racial and ethnic populations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Yingye Zheng & Tianxi Cai & Ziding Feng, 2006. "Application of the Time-Dependent ROC Curves for Prognostic Accuracy with Multiple Biomarkers," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 279-287, March.
    19. C. Jason Liang & Patrick J. Heagerty, 2017. "Rejoinder to discussions on: A risk-based measure of time-varying prognostic discrimination for survival models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 745-748, September.
    20. Ozcan, Erhan C. & Görgülü, Berk & Baydogan, Mustafa G., 2024. "Column generation-based prototype learning for optimizing area under the receiver operating characteristic curve," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 297-307.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:10:p:1657-:d:419638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.