IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i7p1182-d1627579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hesitant Fuzzy Consensus Reaching Process for Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Liang

    (School of Economics and Management, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China
    Department of Computer Science, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain)

  • Álvaro Labella

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain)

  • Meng-Jun Meng

    (School of Vocational Education, Shandong Youth University of Political Science, Jinan 250103, China)

  • Ying-Ming Wang

    (Decision Science Institute, School of Economics & Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

  • Rosa M. Rodríguez

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain)

Abstract

The emergence and popularity of social media have made large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) problems increasingly common, resulting in significant research interest in this field. LSGDM involves numerous evaluators, which can lead to disagreements and hesitancy among them. Hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs) become crucial in this context as they capture the uncertainty and hesitancy among evaluators. On the other hand, research on the Consensus Reaching Process (CRP) becomes particularly important in dealing with the inevitable differences among the great number of evaluators. Ways to mitigate these differences to reach an agreement are a crucial area of study. For this reason, this paper presents a new CRP model to deal with LSGDM problems in hesitant fuzzy environments. First, HFSs and Normal-type Hesitant Fuzzy Sets (N-HFSs) are introduced to integrate evaluators’ subgroup and collective opinions, aiming to preserve as much decision information as possible while reducing computational complexity. Subsequently, a CRP with a detailed feedback suggestion generation mechanism is developed, which considers the willingness of evaluators to modify their opinions, thereby improving the effectiveness of reaching an agreement. Finally, a LSGDM framework that does not require any normalization process is proposed, and its feasibility and robustness are demonstrated through a numerical example.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Liang & Álvaro Labella & Meng-Jun Meng & Ying-Ming Wang & Rosa M. Rodríguez, 2025. "Hesitant Fuzzy Consensus Reaching Process for Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-28, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:7:p:1182-:d:1627579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/7/1182/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/7/1182/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:7:p:1182-:d:1627579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.