IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i5p838-d1604188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shock Propagation and the Geometry of International Trade: The US–China Trade Bipolarity in the Light of Network Science

Author

Listed:
  • Evangelos Ioannidis

    (School of Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Dimitrios Dadakas

    (School of Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Georgios Angelidis

    (School of Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

What is the impact of geopolitics on the geometry of global trade? What is the key structural role that led to the emergence of the US–China trade bipolarity? Here, we study the geometry of international trade, taking into account not only the direct but also the indirect trade relations. We consider the self-weight of each country as an indicator of its intrinsic robustness to exogenous shocks. We assess the vulnerability of a country to potential demand or supply shocks based on the entropy (diversification) of its trade flows. By considering the indirect trade relations, we found that the key structural role that led to the emergence of the US–China trade bipolarity is that of the intermediary hub that acts as a “ bridge ” between different trade clusters. The US and China occupied key network positions of high betweenness centrality as early as 2010. As international trade was increasingly dependent on only these two intermediary trade hubs, this fact led to geopolitical tensions such as the US–China trade war. Therefore, betweenness centrality could serve as a structural indicator, forewarning of possible upcoming geopolitical tensions . The US–China trade bipolarity is also strongly present in self-weights, where a race in terms of their intrinsic robustness to exogenous shocks is more than evident. It is also interesting that the US and China are not only the top shock spreaders but also the most susceptible to shocks. However, China can act more as a shock spreader than a shock receiver, while for the USA, the opposite is true. Regarding the impact of geopolitics, we found that the Russia–Ukraine conflict forced Ukraine to diversify both its exports and imports , aiming to lower its vulnerability to possible shocks . Finally, we found that international trade is becoming increasingly oligopolistic , even when indirect trade relationships are taken into account, thus indicating that a “ Deep Oligopoly ” has formed.

Suggested Citation

  • Evangelos Ioannidis & Dimitrios Dadakas & Georgios Angelidis, 2025. "Shock Propagation and the Geometry of International Trade: The US–China Trade Bipolarity in the Light of Network Science," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-31, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:5:p:838-:d:1604188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/5/838/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/5/838/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:5:p:838-:d:1604188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.