IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i4p578-d1587456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Frequency-Domain Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Wave Propagation Under Different Boundary Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Nonferrous Metals and Geological Environment Monitoring (Ministry of Education), Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
    School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Haiyang Liu

    (Changjiang Geotechnical Engineering Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430010, China)

  • Shikun Dai

    (Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Nonferrous Metals and Geological Environment Monitoring (Ministry of Education), Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
    School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Herui Zhang

    (School of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221000, China)

Abstract

Seismic wave propagation in complex terrains, especially in the presence of air layers, plays a crucial role in accurate subsurface imaging. However, the influence of different boundary conditions on seismic wave propagation characteristics has not been fully explored. This study employs the finite element method (FEM) to simulate and analyze seismic wavefields under different boundary conditions, including perfectly matched layer (PML), Neumann free boundary conditions, and air layer conditions. First, the finite element solution for the 2D frequency-domain acoustic wave equation is introduced, and the correctness of the algorithm is validated using a homogeneous model. Then, both horizontal and undulating terrain interfaces are designed to investigate the kinematic and dynamic characteristics of the wavefields under different boundary conditions. The results show that PML boundaries effectively absorb seismic waves, prevent reflections, and ensure stable wave propagation, making them an ideal choice for simulating open boundaries. In contrast, Neumann boundaries generate significant reflected waves, particularly in undulating terrains, complicating the wavefield characteristics. Introducing an air layer alters the dynamics of the wavefield, leading to energy leakage and multi-path effects, which are more consistent with real-world seismic-geophysical models. Finally, the computational results using the Overthrust model under different boundary conditions further demonstrate that different boundary conditions significantly affect wavefield morphology. It is essential to select appropriate boundary conditions based on the specific simulation requirements, and boundary conditions with an air layer are most consistent with real seismic geological models. This study provides new insights into the role of boundary conditions in seismic numerical simulations and offers theoretical guidance for improving the accuracy of wavefield simulations in realistic geological scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Zhang & Haiyang Liu & Shikun Dai & Herui Zhang, 2025. "Frequency-Domain Finite Element Modeling of Seismic Wave Propagation Under Different Boundary Conditions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-30, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:578-:d:1587456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/4/578/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/4/578/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:578-:d:1587456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.