Author
Listed:
- Yi Liu
(Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA)
- Chang Liu
(Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA)
- Liqiang Ni
(Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA)
- Wei Zhang
(Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA)
- Chen Chen
(Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA)
- Janet Lopez
(College of Nursing, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA)
- Hao Zheng
(Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA)
- Ladda Thiamwong
(College of Nursing, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA
Disability, Aging and Technology Cluster, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA)
- Rui Xie
(Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA
College of Nursing, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA
Disability, Aging and Technology Cluster, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA)
Abstract
Falls are a major cause of injury among older adults. The Physio-fEedback Exercise pRogram (PEER) combines physio-feedback, cognitive reframing, and guided exercises to reduce fall risk. However, its impact on physical activity (PA) over time is underexplored. Functional time-series analysis offers insight into behavior patterns and sustainability. This preliminary study assessed PEER’s effectiveness in improving PA levels immediately and over time. A total of 64 community-dwelling older adults were cluster-randomized into PEER ( N = 33 ) or control groups ( N = 31 ). Participants wore Fitbit trackers, generating time-series data on activity. The PEER group completed an 8-week program, while the control group received CDC fall prevention pamphlets. PA data were analyzed using smoothing spline analysis of variance (SSANOVA), chosen for its flexibility in modeling complex, non-linear relationships in time-series data and its ability to handle skewed distributions and repeated measures. Unlike traditional parametric models, SSANOVA decomposes temporal trends into interpretable components, capturing both smooth trends and abrupt changes, such as those occurring on group workout days. This capability ensures robust and nuanced analysis of intervention effects. Results showed PEER participants significantly increased evenly and had very active minutes and reduced sedentary behavior during the intervention. No significant effect was found for light active minutes. Specifically, during the intervention period, PEER participants engaged in an average of 6.7 % fewer sedentary minutes per day, 13.8 % additional fairly active minutes per day, and 2.8 % additional very active minutes per day compared to the control group. While the reduction in sedentary minutes and increase in fairly active minutes were not statistically significant, the increase in very active minutes was significant. However, our functional time-series analysis revealed these improvements diminished over the 15-week follow-up, indicating challenges in maintaining PA. In conclusion, PEER boosts PA and reduces sedentary behavior short-term, but strategies are needed to sustain these benefits. In conclusion, PEER boosts PA and reduces sedentary behavior short-term, but strategies are needed to sustain these benefits. Public health policies should emphasize technology-driven fall risk assessments, community-based prevention programs, and initiatives that promote physical activity, home safety, and chronic condition management.
Suggested Citation
Yi Liu & Chang Liu & Liqiang Ni & Wei Zhang & Chen Chen & Janet Lopez & Hao Zheng & Ladda Thiamwong & Rui Xie, 2025.
"Effectiveness of PEER Intervention on Older Adults’ Physical Activity Time Series Using Smoothing Spline ANOVA,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:516-:d:1583277
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:516-:d:1583277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.