IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i3p371-d1574754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mathematical Modeling of Ride-Hailing Matching Considering Uncertain User and Driver Preferences: Interval-Valued Fuzzy Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Sudradjat Supian

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Subiyanto Subiyanto

    (Department of Marine Science, Faculty of Fishery and Marine Science, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Sisilia Sylviani

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Tubagus Robbi Megantara

    (Doctoral Program in Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia
    Departement of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, The National University of the Republic of Indonesia, Bandung 40263, Indonesia)

  • Abdul Talib Bon

    (Department of Production and Operations, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Parit Raja 86400, Malaysia)

  • Vasile Preda

    (Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bucharest, Str. Academiei 14, 010014 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This study introduces a fuzzy interval-valued approach using multi-objective linear programming to optimize passenger–driver matching in ride-hailing systems, addressing uncertainties in waiting times and fare preferences. The model aims to minimize total waiting times, balance job allocations among drivers, and reduce deviations in fare expectations between passengers and drivers. The proposed framework effectively manages operational uncertainties by incorporating interval-valued fuzzy parameters, including traffic variability and fluctuating demand patterns. Numerical experiments using real-world data demonstrate that the interval-valued fuzzy model significantly outperforms deterministic methods in reducing average waiting times, achieving higher request fulfillment rates, and ensuring a more equitable distribution of assignments among drivers. The results highlight the model’s robustness and adaptability, particularly under high uncertainty scenarios, and its ability to maintain service reliability and user satisfaction. While computational complexity remains a limitation, integrating the model with AI and IoT technologies offers promising avenues for scalability and real-time applications. These findings contribute to advancing optimization frameworks in ride-hailing systems, emphasizing uncertainty management’s importance in enhancing operational efficiency and fairness.

Suggested Citation

  • Sudradjat Supian & Subiyanto Subiyanto & Sisilia Sylviani & Tubagus Robbi Megantara & Abdul Talib Bon & Vasile Preda, 2025. "Mathematical Modeling of Ride-Hailing Matching Considering Uncertain User and Driver Preferences: Interval-Valued Fuzzy Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:371-:d:1574754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/3/371/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/3/371/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. E. Bellman & L. A. Zadeh, 1970. "Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 141-164, December.
    2. Boeing, Geoff, 2017. "OSMnx: New Methods for Acquiring, Constructing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Complex Street Networks," SocArXiv q86sd, Center for Open Science.
    3. Wang, Jun & Wang, Xiaolei & Yang, Shan & Yang, Hai & Zhang, Xiaoning & Gao, Ziyou, 2021. "Predicting the matching probability and the expected ride/shared distance for each dynamic ridepooling order: A mathematical modeling approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 125-146.
    4. Chiang, Jershan, 2001. "Fuzzy linear programming based on statistical confidence interval and interval-valued fuzzy set," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 65-86, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tubagus Robbi Megantara & Sudradjat Supian & Diah Chaerani, 2022. "Strategies to Reduce Ride-Hailing Fuel Consumption Caused by Pick-Up Trips: A Mathematical Model under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Sudradjat Supian & Subiyanto & Tubagus Robbi Megantara & Abdul Talib Bon, 2024. "Ride-Hailing Matching with Uncertain Travel Time: A Novel Interval-Valued Fuzzy Multi-Objective Linear Programming Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Vuciterna, Rina & Thomsen, Michael & Popp, Jennie & Musliu, Arben, 2017. "Efficiency and Competitiveness of Kosovo Raspberry Producers," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252770, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Collan, Mikael, 2008. "New Method for Real Option Valuation Using Fuzzy Numbers," Working Papers 466, IAMSR, Åbo Akademi.
    5. Wenyao Niu & Yuan Rong & Liying Yu & Lu Huang, 2022. "A Novel Hybrid Group Decision Making Approach Based on EDAS and Regret Theory under a Fermatean Cubic Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-30, August.
    6. de Andres-Sanchez, Jorge, 2007. "Claim reserving with fuzzy regression and Taylor's geometric separation method," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 145-163, January.
    7. Matteo Böhm & Mirco Nanni & Luca Pappalardo, 2022. "Gross polluters and vehicle emissions reduction," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(8), pages 699-707, August.
    8. Mikhailov, L., 2004. "A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(3), pages 687-704, December.
    9. Hongyi Sun & Bingqian Zhang & Wenbin Ni, 2022. "A Hybrid Model Based on SEM and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Supplier Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Liu, Yong-Jun & Zhang, Wei-Guo, 2015. "A multi-period fuzzy portfolio optimization model with minimum transaction lots," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 933-941.
    11. Sakawa, Masatoshi & Kato, Kosuke, 1998. "An interactive fuzzy satisficing method for structured multiobjective linear fractional programs with fuzzy numbers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 575-589, June.
    12. Sajid Ali & Sang-Moon Lee & Choon-Man Jang, 2017. "Determination of the Most Optimal On-Shore Wind Farm Site Location Using a GIS-MCDM Methodology: Evaluating the Case of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Bogdana Stanojević & Milan Stanojević & Sorin Nădăban, 2021. "Reinstatement of the Extension Principle in Approaching Mathematical Programming with Fuzzy Numbers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, June.
    14. Svajone Bekesiene & Serhii Mashchenko, 2023. "On Nash Equilibria in a Finite Game for Fuzzy Sets of Strategies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-12, November.
    15. Qian-Yun Tan & Cui-Ping Wei & Qi Liu & Xiang-Qian Feng, 2016. "The Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic TOPSIS Method Based on Novel Information Measures," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(05), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Lorenzo Barbieri & Roberto D’Autilia & Paola Marrone & Ilaria Montella, 2023. "Graph Representation of the 15-Minute City: A Comparison between Rome, London, and Paris," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    17. Hsiao, Tzy-yih, 2006. "Establish standards of standard costing with the application of convergent gray zone test," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 593-611, January.
    18. Zola, Fernanda Cavicchioli & Colmenero, João Carlos & Aragão, Franciely Velozo & Rodrigues, Thaisa & Junior, Aldo Braghini, 2020. "Multicriterial model for selecting a charcoal kiln," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    19. Adel Hatami-Marbini & Madjid Tavana & Kobra Gholami & Zahra Ghelej Beigi, 2015. "A Bounded Data Envelopment Analysis Model in a Fuzzy Environment with an Application to Safety in the Semiconductor Industry," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 679-701, February.
    20. Manuel Casal-Guisande & Alberto Comesaña-Campos & Alejandro Pereira & José-Benito Bouza-Rodríguez & Jorge Cerqueiro-Pequeño, 2022. "A Decision-Making Methodology Based on Expert Systems Applied to Machining Tools Condition Monitoring," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-30, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:371-:d:1574754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.