IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2024i1p68-d1555022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Spurious-Negative Sample Augmentation-Based Quality Evaluation Method for Cybersecurity Knowledge Graph

Author

Listed:
  • Bin Chen

    (School of Cyber Science and Technology, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China)

  • Hongyi Li

    (School of Cyber Science and Technology, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China)

  • Ze Shi

    (School of Cyber Science and Technology, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
    School of Artificial Intelligence, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China)

Abstract

As the forms of cyber threats become increasingly severe, cybersecurity knowledge graphs (KGs) have become essential tools for understanding and mitigating these threats. However, the quality of the KG is critical to its effectiveness in cybersecurity applications. In this paper, we propose a spurious-negative sample augmentation-based quality evaluation method for cybersecurity KGs (SNAQE) that includes two key modules: the multi-scale spurious-negative triple detection module and the adaptive mixup based on the attention mechanism module. The multi-scale spurious-negative triple detection module classifies the sampled negative triples into spurious-negative and true-negative triples. Subsequently, the attention mechanism-based adaptive mixup module selects appropriate mixup targets for each spurious-negative triple, constructing partially correct triples and achieving more precise sample generation in the entity embedding space to assist in training the KG quality evaluation models. Through extensive experimental validation, the SNAQE model not only performs excellently in general-domain KG quality evaluation but also achieves outstanding outcomes in the cybersecurity KGs, significantly enhancing the accuracy and F1 score of the model, with the best F1 score of 0.969 achieved on the FB15K dataset.

Suggested Citation

  • Bin Chen & Hongyi Li & Ze Shi, 2024. "Research on Spurious-Negative Sample Augmentation-Based Quality Evaluation Method for Cybersecurity Knowledge Graph," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:68-:d:1555022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/1/68/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/1/68/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuchen Sha & Yujian Feng & Miao He & Shangdong Liu & Yimu Ji, 2023. "Retrieval-Augmented Knowledge Graph Reasoning for Commonsense Question Answering," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Zefan Zeng & Qing Cheng & Yuehang Si, 2023. "Logical Rule-Based Knowledge Graph Reasoning: A Comprehensive Survey," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-37, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:68-:d:1555022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.