IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i5p714-d1348118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy Divergence Measure Based on Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution Method for Staff Performance Appraisal

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamad Shahiir Saidin

    (Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Lai Soon Lee

    (Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
    Laboratory of Computational Statistics and Operations Research, Institute for Mathematical Research, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Hsin-Vonn Seow

    (Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Semenyih 43500, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Stefan Pickl

    (Fakultät für Informatik, Universität der Bundeswehr München, 85577 Neubiberg, Germany)

Abstract

Fuzzy set theory has extensively employed various divergence measure methods to quantify distinctions between two elements. The primary objective of this study is to introduce a generalized divergence measure integrated into the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) approach. Given the inherent uncertainty and ambiguity in multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) scenarios, the concept of the fuzzy α -cut is leveraged. This allows experts to establish a broader spectrum of rankings, accommodating fluctuations in their confidence levels. To produce consistent criteria weights with the existence of outliers, the fuzzy Method based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC) is employed. To showcase the viability and effectiveness of the proposed approach, a quantitative illustration is provided through a staff performance review. In this context, the findings are compared with other MCDM methodologies, considering correlation coefficients and CPU time. The results demonstrate that the proposed technique aligns with current distance measure approaches, with all correlation coefficient values exceeding 0.9. Notably, the proposed method also boasts the shortest CPU time when compared to alternative divergence measure methodologies. As a result, it becomes evident that the proposed technique yields more sensible and practical results compared to its counterparts in this category.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamad Shahiir Saidin & Lai Soon Lee & Hsin-Vonn Seow & Stefan Pickl, 2024. "Fuzzy Divergence Measure Based on Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution Method for Staff Performance Appraisal," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-28, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:5:p:714-:d:1348118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/5/714/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/5/714/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohamad Shahiir Saidin & Lai Soon Lee & Siti Mahani Marjugi & Muhammad Zaini Ahmad & Hsin-Vonn Seow, 2023. "Fuzzy Method Based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC) for Determining Objective Weights in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anas A. Makki & Reda M. S. Abdulaal, 2023. "A Hybrid MCDM Approach Based on Fuzzy MEREC-G and Fuzzy RATMI," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Peng Liu & Tieyan Zhang & Furui Tian & Yun Teng & Miaodong Yang, 2024. "Optimized Grid Partitioning and Scheduling in Multi-Energy Systems Using a Hybrid Decision-Making Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:5:p:714-:d:1348118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.