Author
Listed:
- Jonas Jasse
(Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Dusseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany)
- Hans-Joerg Wittsack
(Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Dusseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany)
- Thomas Andreas Thiel
(Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Dusseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany)
- Romans Zukovs
(Department of Haematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Dusseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany)
- Birte Valentin
(Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Dusseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany)
- Gerald Antoch
(Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Dusseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany)
- Alexandra Ljimani
(Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Dusseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany)
Abstract
In DWI, multi-exponential signal analysis can be used to determine signal underlying diffusion components. However, the approach is very complex due to the inherent low SNR, the limited number of signal decay data points, and the absence of appropriate acquisition parameters and standardized analysis methods. Within the scope of this work, different methods for multi-exponential analysis of the diffusion signal in the kidney were compared. To assess the impact of fitting parameters, a simulation was conducted comparing the free non-negative (NNLS) and rigid non-linear least square (NLLS) fitting methods. The simulation demonstrated improved accuracy for NNLS in combination with area-under-curve estimation. Furthermore, the accuracy and stability of the results were further enhanced utilizing optimized parameters, namely 350 logarithmically spaced diffusion coefficients within [0.7, 300] × 10 −3 mm 2 /s and a minimal SNR of 100. The NNLS approach shows an improvement over the rigid NLLS method. This becomes apparent not only in terms of accuracy and omitting prior knowledge, but also in better representation of renal tissue physiology. By employing the determined fitting parameters, it is expected that more stable and reliable results for diffusion imaging in the kidney can be achieved. This might enable more accurate DWI results for clinical utilization.
Suggested Citation
Jonas Jasse & Hans-Joerg Wittsack & Thomas Andreas Thiel & Romans Zukovs & Birte Valentin & Gerald Antoch & Alexandra Ljimani, 2024.
"Toward Optimal Fitting Parameters for Multi-Exponential DWI Image Analysis of the Human Kidney: A Simulation Study Comparing Different Fitting Algorithms,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:4:p:609-:d:1341065
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:4:p:609-:d:1341065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.