IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i4p602-d1340635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An ETD Method for Vulnerable American Options

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Company

    (Instituto de Matemática Multidisciplinar, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Vera N. Egorova

    (Departamento de Matemática Aplicada y Ciencias de la Computación, Universidad de Cantabria, Avenida de los Castros, s/n, 39005 Santander, Spain)

  • Lucas Jódar

    (Instituto de Matemática Multidisciplinar, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

This paper introduces the exponential time differencing (ETD) technique as a numerical method to efficiently solve vulnerable American options pricing. We address several challenges, including removing cross-derivative terms through appropriate transformations, treating early-exercise opportunities using the penalty method, and substituting fixed boundary conditions with corresponding one-sided finite differences. The proposed method is shown to be both accurate and efficient through numerical experiments, which also compare the results with existing methods and analyze the numerical stability and convergence rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Company & Vera N. Egorova & Lucas Jódar, 2024. "An ETD Method for Vulnerable American Options," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:4:p:602-:d:1340635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/4/602/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/4/602/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Company & V. N. Egorova & L. Jódar, 2014. "Solving American Option Pricing Models by the Front Fixing Method: Numerical Analysis and Computing," Abstract and Applied Analysis, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-9, April.
    2. Mao‐Wei Hung & Yu‐Hong Liu, 2005. "Pricing vulnerable options in incomplete markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 135-170, February.
    3. Lung-Fu Chang & Mao-Wei Hung, 2006. "Valuation of vulnerable American options with correlated credit risk," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 137-165, September.
    4. Klein, Peter, 1996. "Pricing Black-Scholes options with correlated credit risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(7), pages 1211-1229, August.
    5. Black, Fischer & Scholes, Myron S, 1973. "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(3), pages 637-654, May-June.
    6. repec:eme:mfppss:v:36:y:2010:i:5:p:414-430 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Hull, John & White, Alan, 1995. "The impact of default risk on the prices of options and other derivative securities," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 299-322, May.
    8. Ju, Nengjiu, 1998. "Pricing an American Option by Approximating Its Early Exercise Boundary as a Multipiece Exponential Function," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 11(3), pages 627-646.
    9. Klein, Peter & Inglis, Michael, 2001. "Pricing vulnerable European options when the option's payoff can increase the risk of financial distress," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 993-1012, May.
    10. Geske, Robert & Johnson, Herb E, 1984. "The American Put Option Valued Analytically," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 39(5), pages 1511-1524, December.
    11. Johnson, Herb & Stulz, Rene, 1987. "The Pricing of Options with Default Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 42(2), pages 267-280, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Larkin, James & Matthes, Britta & Azribi, Mohamed & Kearns, Conor & Mulinari, Shai & Rickard, Emily & Moriarty, Frank & Fahey, Tom & Ozieranski, Piotr, 2024. "Drug company methodologies used for reporting in the UK pharmaceutical industry payment transparency database between 2015 and 2019: A content analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    2. Szu-Lang Liao & Hsing-Hua Huang, 2005. "Pricing Black-Scholes options with correlated interest rate risk and credit risk: an extension," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(5), pages 443-457.
    3. Marcelo Fabián Perillo, 2023. "Valuación de Títulos de Deuda Indexados al Comportamiento de un Índice Accionario: Un Modelo con Riesgo de Crédito," Revista de Análisis Económico y Financiero, Universidad de San Martín de Porres, vol. 6(02), pages 01-06.
    4. Zonggang Ma & Chaoqun Ma & Zhijian Wu, 2022. "Pricing commodity-linked bonds with stochastic convenience yield, interest rate and counterparty credit risk: application of Mellin transform methods," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 47-91, April.
    5. Lung-Fu Chang & Mao-Wei Hung, 2006. "Valuation of vulnerable American options with correlated credit risk," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 137-165, September.
    6. Xie, Yurong & Deng, Guohe, 2022. "Vulnerable European option pricing in a Markov regime-switching Heston model with stochastic interest rate," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Marcelo F. Perillo, 2021. "Valuación de Títulos de Deuda Indexados al Comportamiento de un Índice Accionario: Un Modelo con Riesgo de Crédito, Parte 2," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 790, Universidad del CEMA.
    8. Vicky Henderson & Gechun Liang, 2011. "A Multidimensional Exponential Utility Indifference Pricing Model with Applications to Counterparty Risk," Papers 1111.3856, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2015.
    9. Suresh M. Sundaresan, 2000. "Continuous‐Time Methods in Finance: A Review and an Assessment," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1569-1622, August.
    10. Chueh-Yung Tsao & Chao-Ching Liu, 2012. "Asian Options with Credit Risks: Pricing and Sensitivity Analysis," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(S3), pages 96-115, September.
    11. Geonwoo Kim, 2020. "Valuation of Exchange Option with Credit Risk in a Hybrid Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-11, November.
    12. F. Antonelli & A. Ramponi & S. Scarlatti, 2021. "CVA and vulnerable options pricing by correlation expansions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 401-427, April.
    13. Li, Gang & Zhang, Chu, 2019. "Counterparty credit risk and derivatives pricing," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(3), pages 647-668.
    14. Ma, Chaoqun & Ma, Zonggang & Xiao, Shisong, 2019. "A closed-form pricing formula for vulnerable European options under stochastic yield spreads and interest rates," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 59-68.
    15. Gechun Liang & Xingchun Wang, 2021. "Pricing vulnerable options in a hybrid credit risk model driven by Heston–Nandi GARCH processes," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-30, April.
    16. Dirk Broeders, 2006. "Valuation of Conditional Pension Liabilities and Guarantees under Sponsor Vulnerabilities," DNB Working Papers 082, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    17. Lee, Min-Ku & Kim, Jeong-Hoon, 2018. "Pricing of defaultable options with multiscale generalized Heston’s stochastic volatility," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 235-246.
    18. Jeon, Jaegi & Kim, Geonwoo & Huh, Jeonggyu, 2021. "An asymptotic expansion approach to the valuation of vulnerable options under a multiscale stochastic volatility model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    19. Lian, Yu-Min & Chen, Jun-Home, 2024. "Pricing vulnerable options under cross-asset markov-modulated jump-diffusion dynamics," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    20. Wang, Guanying & Wang, Xingchun & Zhou, Ke, 2017. "Pricing vulnerable options with stochastic volatility," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 485(C), pages 91-103.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:4:p:602-:d:1340635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.