IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i24p3966-d1545860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Predictive Accuracy of Regression Models with First-Order Autoregressive Disturbances: A Comparative Approach Using Artificial Neural Networks and Classical Estimators

Author

Listed:
  • Rauf I. Rauf

    (Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Abuja, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria)

  • Masad A. Alrasheedi

    (Department of Management Information Systems, Faculty of Business Administration, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Al-Munawara 42358, Saudi Arabia)

  • Rasheedah Sadiq

    (National Bureau of Statistics, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria)

  • Abdulrahman M. A. Aldawsari

    (Department of Mathematics, College of Sciences and Humanities, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 16273, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

In the last decade, the size and complexity of datasets have expanded significantly, necessitating more sophisticated predictive methods. Despite this growth, limited research has been conducted on the effects of autocorrelation within widely used regression methods. This study addresses this gap by investigating how autocorrelation impacts the predictive accuracy and efficiency of six regression approaches: Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), Cochrane–Orcutt (CO), Prais–Winsten (PW), Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE), and Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (RMLE). The study evaluates each method’s performance on three datasets characterized by autocorrelation, comparing their predictive accuracy and variability. The analysis is structured into three phases: the first phase examines predictive accuracy across methods using Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE); the second phase evaluates the efficiency of parameter estimation based on standard errors across methods; and the final phase visually assesses the closeness of predicted values to actual values through scatter plots. The results indicate that the ANN consistently provides the most accurate predictions, particularly in large sample sizes with extensive training data. For GDP data, the ANN achieved an MSE of 1.05 × 10 9 , an MAE of 23,344.64, and an MAPE of 81.66%, demonstrating up to a 90% reduction in the MSE compared to OLS. These findings underscore the advantages of the ANN for predictive tasks involving autocorrelated data, highlighting its robustness and suitability for complex, large-scale datasets. This study provides practical guidance for selecting optimal prediction techniques in the presence of autocorrelation, recommending the ANN as the preferred method due to its superior performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Rauf I. Rauf & Masad A. Alrasheedi & Rasheedah Sadiq & Abdulrahman M. A. Aldawsari, 2024. "Evaluating Predictive Accuracy of Regression Models with First-Order Autoregressive Disturbances: A Comparative Approach Using Artificial Neural Networks and Classical Estimators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:24:p:3966-:d:1545860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/24/3966/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/24/3966/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rauf I. RAUF & Bello A. HAMIDU & Bodunwa O. KIKELOMO & Ayinde KAYODE & Alabi O. OLUSEGUN, 2024. "Heteroscedasticity Correction Measures In Stochastic Frontier Analysis," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 155-165, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:24:p:3966-:d:1545860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.