IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i23p3818-d1535201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mixed Multi-Strategy Improved Aquila Optimizer and Its Application in Path Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Tianyue Bao

    (Electrical Information Engineering Department, Northeast Petroleum University Qinhuangdao Campus, Qinhuangdao 066000, China)

  • Jiaxin Zhao

    (Electrical Information Engineering Department, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163000, China)

  • Yanchang Liu

    (Electrical Information Engineering Department, Northeast Petroleum University Qinhuangdao Campus, Qinhuangdao 066000, China)

  • Xusheng Guo

    (Electrical Information Engineering Department, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163000, China)

  • Tianshuo Chen

    (Electrical Information Engineering Department, Northeast Petroleum University Qinhuangdao Campus, Qinhuangdao 066000, China)

Abstract

With the growing prevalence of drone technology across various sectors, efficient and safe path planning has emerged as a critical research priority. Traditional Aquila Optimizers, while effective, face limitations such as uneven population initialization, a tendency to get trapped in local optima, and slow convergence rates. This study presents a multi-strategy fusion of the improved Aquila Optimizer, aiming to enhance its performance by integrating diverse optimization techniques, particularly in the context of path planning. Key enhancements include the integration of Bernoulli chaotic mapping to improve initial population diversity, a spiral stepping strategy to boost search precision and diversity, and a “stealing” mechanism from the Dung Beetle Optimization algorithm to enhance global search capabilities and convergence. Additionally, a nonlinear balance factor is employed to dynamically manage the exploration–exploitation trade-off, thereby increasing the optimization of speed and accuracy. The effectiveness of the mixed multi-strategy improved Aquila Optimizer is validated through simulations on benchmark test functions, CEC2017 complex functions, and path planning scenarios. Comparative analysis with seven other optimization algorithms reveals that the proposed method significantly improves both convergence speed and optimization accuracy. These findings highlight the potential of mixed multi-strategy improved Aquila Optimizer in advancing drone path planning performance, offering enhanced safety and efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Tianyue Bao & Jiaxin Zhao & Yanchang Liu & Xusheng Guo & Tianshuo Chen, 2024. "Mixed Multi-Strategy Improved Aquila Optimizer and Its Application in Path Planning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:23:p:3818-:d:1535201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/23/3818/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/23/3818/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Xuncai & Wang, Shida & Zhao, Kai & Wang, Yanfeng, 2023. "A salp swarm algorithm based on Harris Eagle foraging strategy," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 858-877.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shahad Ibrahim Mohammed & Nazar K. Hussein & Outman Haddani & Mansourah Aljohani & Mohammed Abdulrazaq Alkahya & Mohammed Qaraad, 2024. "Fine-Tuned Cardiovascular Risk Assessment: Locally Weighted Salp Swarm Algorithm in Global Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-39, January.
    2. Zhang, Hongbo & Qin, Xiwen & Gao, Xueliang & Zhang, Siqi & Tian, Yunsheng & Zhang, Wei, 2024. "Improved salp swarm algorithm based on Newton interpolation and cosine opposition-based learning for feature selection," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 544-558.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:23:p:3818-:d:1535201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.