IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i23p3696-d1529255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient Tuning of an Isotope Separation Online System Through Safe Bayesian Optimization with Simulation-Informed Gaussian Process for the Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Santiago Ramos Garces

    (Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), 2400 Mol, Belgium
    Co-Design for Cyber-Physical Systems (CoSysLab), Department of Electromechanics, University of Antwerp, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Ivan De Boi

    (Industrial Vision Lab (InViLab), Department of Electromechanics, University of Antwerp, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • João Pedro Ramos

    (Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), 2400 Mol, Belgium)

  • Marc Dierckx

    (Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), 2400 Mol, Belgium)

  • Lucia Popescu

    (Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), 2400 Mol, Belgium)

  • Stijn Derammelaere

    (Co-Design for Cyber-Physical Systems (CoSysLab), Department of Electromechanics, University of Antwerp, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium
    The Strategic Research Centre for the Manufacturing Industry (Flanders Make-AnSyMo/Cosys), University of Antwerp, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium)

Abstract

Optimizing process outcomes by tuning parameters through an automated system is common in industry. Ideally, this optimization is performed as efficiently as possible, using the minimum number of steps to achieve an optimal configuration. However, care must often be taken to ensure that, in pursuing the optimal solution, the process does not enter an “unsafe” state (for the process itself or its surroundings). Safe Bayesian optimization is a viable method in such contexts, as it guarantees constraint fulfillment during the optimization process, ensuring the system remains safe. This method assumes the constraints are real-valued and continuous functions. However, in some cases, the constraints are binary (true/false) or classification-based (safe/unsafe), limiting the direct application of safe Bayesian optimization. Therefore, a slight modification of safe Bayesian optimization allows for applying the method using a probabilistic classifier for learning classification constraints. However, violation of constraints may occur during the optimization process, as the theoretical guarantees of safe Bayesian optimization do not apply to discontinuous functions. This paper addresses this limitation by introducing an enhanced version of safe Bayesian optimization incorporating a simulation-informed Gaussian process (GP) for handling classification constraints. The simulation-informed GP transforms the classification constraint into a piece-wise function, enabling the application of safe Bayesian optimization. We applied this approach to optimize the parameters of a computational model for the isotope separator online (ISOL) at the MYRRHA facility (Multipurpose Hybrid Research Reactor for High-Tech Applications). The results revealed a significant reduction in constraint violations—approximately 80 % —compared to safe Bayesian optimization methods that directly learn the classification constraints using Laplace approximation and expectation propagation . The sensitivity to the accuracy of the simulation model was analyzed to determine the extent to which it is advantageous to use the proposed method. These findings suggest that incorporating available information into the optimization process is valuable for reducing the number of unsafe outcomes in constrained optimization scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Santiago Ramos Garces & Ivan De Boi & João Pedro Ramos & Marc Dierckx & Lucia Popescu & Stijn Derammelaere, 2024. "Efficient Tuning of an Isotope Separation Online System Through Safe Bayesian Optimization with Simulation-Informed Gaussian Process for the Constraints," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:23:p:3696-:d:1529255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/23/3696/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/23/3696/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:23:p:3696-:d:1529255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.