IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i22p3516-d1518343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aperiodic Optimal Chronotherapy in Simple Compartment Tumour Growth Models Under Circadian Drug Toxicity Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Byron D. E. Tzamarias

    (MathSys CDT, Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK)

  • Annabelle Ballesta

    (Inserm U900, Cancer Systems Pharmacology Team, Institut Curie, MINES ParisTech, CBIO, PSL Research University, 35 Rue Dailly, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France)

  • Nigel John Burroughs

    (SBIDER, Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK)

Abstract

Cancer cells typically divide with weaker synchronisation with the circadian clock than normal cells, with the degree of decoupling increasing with tumour maturity. Chronotherapy exploits this loss of synchronisation, using drugs with circadian-clock-dependent activity and timed infusion to balance the competing demands of reducing toxicity toward normal cells that display physiological circadian rhythms and of efficacy against the tumour. We analysed optimal chronotherapy for one-compartment nonlinear tumour growth models that were no longer synchronised with the circadian clock, minimising a cost function with a periodically driven running cost accounting for the circadian drug tolerability of normal cells. Using Pontryagin’s Minimum Principle (PMP), we show, for drugs that either increase the cell death rate or kill dividing cells, that optimal solutions are aperiodic bang–bang solutions with two switches per day, with the duration of the daily drug administration increasing as treatment progresses; for large tumours, optimal therapy can in fact switch mid treatment from aperiodic to continuous treatment. We illustrate this with tumours grown under logistic and Gompertz dynamics conditions; for logistic growth, we categorise the different types of solutions. Singular solutions can be applicable for some nonlinear tumour growth models if the per capita growth rate is convex. Direct comparison of the optimal aperiodic solution with the optimal periodic solution shows the former presents reduced toxicity whilst retaining similar efficacy against the tumour. We only found periodic solutions with a daily period in one-compartment exponential growth models, whilst models incorporating nonlinear growth had generic aperiodic solutions, and linear multi-compartments appeared to have long-period (weeks) periodic solutions. Our results suggest that chronotherapy-based optimal solutions under a harmonic running cost are not typically periodic infusion schedules with a 24 h period.

Suggested Citation

  • Byron D. E. Tzamarias & Annabelle Ballesta & Nigel John Burroughs, 2024. "Aperiodic Optimal Chronotherapy in Simple Compartment Tumour Growth Models Under Circadian Drug Toxicity Conditions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-37, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:22:p:3516-:d:1518343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/22/3516/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/22/3516/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jinghua Shi & Oguzhan Alagoz & Fatih Erenay & Qiang Su, 2014. "A survey of optimization models on cancer chemotherapy treatment planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 221(1), pages 331-356, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Najmeddine Dhieb & Ismail Abdulrashid & Hakim Ghazzai & Yehia Massoud, 2023. "Optimized drug regimen and chemotherapy scheduling for cancer treatment using swarm intelligence," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 757-770, January.
    2. Poh Ling Tan & Helmut Maurer & Jeevan Kanesan & Joon Huang Chuah, 2022. "Optimal Control of Cancer Chemotherapy with Delays and State Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 194(3), pages 749-770, September.
    3. Kai He & Lisa M. Maillart & Oleg A. Prokopyev, 2019. "Optimal sequencing of heterogeneous, non-instantaneous interventions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 276(1), pages 109-135, May.
    4. Itziar Irurzun-Arana & Alvaro Janda & Sergio Ardanza-Trevijano & Iñaki F Trocóniz, 2018. "Optimal dynamic control approach in a multi-objective therapeutic scenario: Application to drug delivery in the treatment of prostate cancer," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Nazila Bazrafshan & M. M. Lotfi, 2020. "A finite-horizon Markov decision process model for cancer chemotherapy treatment planning: an application to sequential treatment decision making in clinical trials," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(1), pages 483-502, December.
    6. Temitayo Ajayi & Seyedmohammadhossein Hosseinian & Andrew J. Schaefer & Clifton D. Fuller, 2024. "Combination Chemotherapy Optimization with Discrete Dosing," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 434-455, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:22:p:3516-:d:1518343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.