IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i22p3476-d1515806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Privacy-Preserving Record Linkage Technology Based on the Modified Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation Method

Author

Listed:
  • Shumin Han

    (School of Artificial Intelligence and Software, Liaoning Petrochemical University, Fushun 113001, China)

  • Yue Li

    (School of Artificial Intelligence and Software, Liaoning Petrochemical University, Fushun 113001, China)

  • Derong Shen

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China)

  • Chuang Wang

    (School of Artificial Intelligence and Software, Liaoning Petrochemical University, Fushun 113001, China)

Abstract

The era of big data has brought rapid growth and widespread application of data, but the imperfections in the existing data integration system have become obstacles to its high-quality development. The conflict between data security and shared utilization is significant, with traditional data integration methods risking data leakage and privacy breaches. The proposed Privacy-Preserving Record Linkage (PPRL) technology, has effectively resolved this contradiction, enabling efficient and secure data sharing. Currently, many solutions have been developed for PPRL issues, but existing assessments of PPRL methods mainly focus on single indicators. There is a scarcity of comprehensive evaluation and comparison frameworks that consider multiple indicators of PPRL(such as linkage quality, computational efficiency, and security), making it challenging to achieve a comprehensive and objective assessment. Therefore, it has become an urgent issue for us to conduct a multi-indicator comprehensive evaluation of different PPRL methods to explore the optimal approach. This article proposes the use of an modified CRITIC method to comprehensively evaluate PPRL methods, aiming to select the optimal PPRL method in terms of linkage quality, computational efficiency, and security. The research results indicate that the improved CRITIC method based on mathematical statistics can achieve weight allocation more objectively and quantify the allocation process effectively. This approach exhibits exceptional objectivity and broad applicability in assessing various PPRL methods, thereby providing robust scientific support for the optimization of PPRL techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Shumin Han & Yue Li & Derong Shen & Chuang Wang, 2024. "Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Privacy-Preserving Record Linkage Technology Based on the Modified Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-23, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:22:p:3476-:d:1515806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/22/3476/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/22/3476/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:22:p:3476-:d:1515806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.