Author
Listed:
- Saulius Gudas
(Informatics and Statistics Department, Faculty of Marine Technologies and Natural Sciences, Klaipeda University, Bijunu St. 17, LT-91225 Klaipeda, Lithuania)
- Vitalijus Denisovas
(Informatics and Statistics Department, Faculty of Marine Technologies and Natural Sciences, Klaipeda University, Bijunu St. 17, LT-91225 Klaipeda, Lithuania)
- Jurij Tekutov
(Informatics and Statistics Department, Faculty of Marine Technologies and Natural Sciences, Klaipeda University, Bijunu St. 17, LT-91225 Klaipeda, Lithuania
Engineering and Informatics Department, Faculty of Technology, Klaipėdos Valstybinė Kolegija–Higher Education Institution, Bijunu St. 10, LT-91223 Klaipeda, Lithuania)
Abstract
This article presents a causal modeling approach for analyzing the processes of an academic institution. Academic processes consist of activities that are considered self-managed systems and are defined as management transactions (MTs). The purpose of this article is to present a method of causal modeling of organizational processes, which helps to determine the internal model of the current process under consideration, its activities, and the processes’ causal dependencies in the management hierarchy of the institution, as well as horizontal and vertical coordination interactions and their content. Internal models of the identified activities were created, corresponding to the MT framework. In the second step, based on the causal model, a taxonomy of characteristics is presented, which helps to systematize the process quality assessment and ensures the completeness of the characteristics and indicators. Predefined structures of characteristic types are the basis of activity content description templates. Based on the proposed method, two causal models are created: the “to-be” causal model of the target study process (based on expert knowledge) and the “as-is” documented (existing) model of the study process used to evaluate the study process’s quality. The principles and examples of comparing the created “to-be” causal model with the existing study process monitoring method are presented, enabling the detection of the shortcomings in the existing method for assessing academic performance. Causal modeling allows for the rethinking of existing interactions and the identification of necessary interactions to improve the quality of studies. The comparison based on causal modeling allows for a systematic analysis of regulations and the consistent identification of new characteristics (indicators) that evaluate relevant aspects of academic processes and activities.
Suggested Citation
Saulius Gudas & Vitalijus Denisovas & Jurij Tekutov, 2024.
"Causal Modeling of Academic Activity and Study Process Management,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-29, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:18:p:2810-:d:1475837
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:18:p:2810-:d:1475837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.