IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i17p2792-d1474618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hybrid Fuzzy Method for Performance Evaluation of City Construction

Author

Listed:
  • Chun-Ming Yang

    (School of Economics and Management, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808, China)

  • Chang-Hsien Hsu

    (Department of Business Administration, Asia University, Taichung 413305, Taiwan)

  • Tian Chen

    (School of Marxism, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808, China)

  • Shiyao Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808, China
    School of Management and Economics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)

Abstract

Evaluating the performance of city construction not only helps optimize city functions and improve city quality, but it also contributes to the development of sustainable cities. However, most of the scoring rules for evaluating the performance of city construction are overly cumbersome and demand very high data integrity. Moreover, the properties, change scale, and scope of different evaluation indicators of city construction often lead to uncertain and ambiguous results. In this study, a hybrid fuzzy method is proposed to conduct the performance evaluation of city construction in two phases. Firstly, a city performance index (CPI) was developed by combining the means and standard deviations of indicators of city construction to address the volatility of historical statistical data as well as different types of data. Considering the sampling errors in data analysis, the parameter estimation method was used to derive the 100% × (1 − α ) confidence interval of the CPI. Buckley’s fuzzy approach was then adopted to extend the statistical estimators from the CPI into fuzzy estimators, after which a fuzzy CPI was proposed. To identify the specific improvement directions for city construction, the fuzzy axiom design (fuzzy AD) method was applied to explore the relationship between the targets set by city managers and actual performance. Finally, an example of six cities in China is provided to illustrate the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed method. The results show that the performance of Chongqing on several evaluation indicators is lower than that of other cities. The proposed method takes into account the issues of uniformity and diversity in the performance evaluation of city construction. It can enable a quantitative assessment of the city construction level in all cities and provide theoretical support and a decision-making basis for relevant government departments to optimize city construction planning and scientifically formulate city construction policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Chun-Ming Yang & Chang-Hsien Hsu & Tian Chen & Shiyao Li, 2024. "Hybrid Fuzzy Method for Performance Evaluation of City Construction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:17:p:2792-:d:1474618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/17/2792/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/17/2792/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Kuen-Suan & Wang, Ching-Hsin & Tan, Kim Hua & Chiu, Shun-Fung, 2019. "Developing one-sided specification six-sigma fuzzy quality index and testing model to measure the process performance of fuzzy information," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 560-565.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuo-Ching Chiou, 2023. "Building Up of Fuzzy Evaluation Model of Life Performance Based on Type-II Censored Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Tai-Shan Lee & Ching-Hsin Wang & Chun-Min Yu, 2019. "Fuzzy Evaluation Model for Enhancing E-Learning Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-11, October.
    3. Kuen-Suan Chen & Chun-Min Yu, 2024. "Developing a novel fuzzy testing model for capability index with asymmetric tolerances," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(1), pages 149-162, September.
    4. Wei Lo & Chun-Ming Yang & Kuei-Kuei Lai & Shao-Yu Li & Chi-Han Chen, 2021. "Developing a Novel Fuzzy Evaluation Model by One-Sided Specification Capability Indices," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-11, May.
    5. Kuen-Suan Chen, 2022. "Fuzzy testing of operating performance index based on confidence intervals," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 19-33, April.
    6. Wang, Ching-Hsin & Chen, Kuen-Suan, 2020. "New process yield index of asymmetric tolerances for bootstrap method and six sigma approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 216-223.
    7. Kuen-Suan Chen & Chun-Min Yu, 2022. "Lifetime performance evaluation and analysis model of passive component capacitor products," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 51-64, April.
    8. Kuen-Suan Chen & Ming-Chieh Huang & Chun-Min Yu & Hsuan-Yu Chen, 2022. "Quality-Based Supplier Selection Model for Products with Multiple Quality Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Kuen-Suan Chen & Chun-Min Yu, 2024. "Confidence-interval-based fuzzy supplier selection model with lifetime performance index," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(1), pages 133-147, September.
    10. Yoon, Man Geun & Kim, Jin Ki, 2022. "Evaluation methodology for safety maturity in air navigation safety," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:17:p:2792-:d:1474618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.