IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i16p2582-d1460981.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leveraging ChatGPT and Long Short-Term Memory in Recommender Algorithm for Self-Management of Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana V. Afanasieva

    (Department of Informatics, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 36, Stremyanny Lane, Moscow 109992, Russia)

  • Pavel V. Platov

    (Department of Information Systems, Ulyanovsk State Technical University, 32, Severny Venetz Street, Ulyanovsk 2432027, Russia)

  • Andrey V. Komolov

    (Department of Informatics, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 36, Stremyanny Lane, Moscow 109992, Russia)

  • Andrey V. Kuzlyakin

    (Department of Informatics, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 36, Stremyanny Lane, Moscow 109992, Russia)

Abstract

One of the new trends in the development of recommendation algorithms is the dissemination of their capabilities to support the population in managing their health, in particular cardiovascular health. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) affect people in their prime years and remain the main cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and their clinical treatment is expensive and time consuming. At the same time, about 80% of them can be prevented, according to the World Federation of Cardiology. The aim of this study is to develop and investigate a knowledge-based recommender algorithm for the self-management of CVD risk factors in adults at home. The proposed algorithm is based on the original user profile, which includes a predictive assessment of the presence of CVD. To obtain a predictive score for CVD presence, AutoML and LSTM models were studied on the Kaggle dataset, and it was shown that the LSTM model, with an accuracy of 0.88, outperformed the AutoML model. The algorithm recommendations generated contain items of three types: targeted, informational, and explanatory. For the first time, large language models, namely ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and ChatGPT-4.o, were leveraged and studied in creating explanations of the recommendations. The experiments show the following: (1) In explaining recommendations, ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and ChatGPT-4.o demonstrate a high accuracy of 71% to 91% and coherence with modern official guidelines of 84% to 92%. (2) The safety properties of ChatGPT-generated explanations estimated by doctors received the highest score of almost 100%. (3) On average, the stability and correctness of the GPT-4.o responses were more acceptable than those of other models for creating explanations. (4) The degree of user satisfaction with the recommendations obtained using the proposed algorithm was 88%, and the rating of the usefulness of the recommendations was 92%.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana V. Afanasieva & Pavel V. Platov & Andrey V. Komolov & Andrey V. Kuzlyakin, 2024. "Leveraging ChatGPT and Long Short-Term Memory in Recommender Algorithm for Self-Management of Cardiovascular Risk Factors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:16:p:2582-:d:1460981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/16/2582/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/16/2582/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dhir Gala & Amgad N. Makaryus, 2023. "The Utility of Language Models in Cardiology: A Narrative Review of the Benefits and Concerns of ChatGPT-4," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Yao Cai & Fei Yu & Manish Kumar & Roderick Gladney & Javed Mostafa, 2022. "Health Recommender Systems Development, Usage, and Evaluation from 2010 to 2022: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Humaid Al Naqbi & Zied Bahroun & Vian Ahmed, 2024. "Enhancing Work Productivity through Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-37, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:16:p:2582-:d:1460981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.