IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i11p1754-d1408960.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multicriteria Decision-Making in Public Security: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Jefferson Costa

    (Department of Management Engineering, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil)

  • Maisa Silva

    (Department of Management Engineering, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil)

Abstract

The Multiple Criteria Decision-Making/Analysis (MCDM/A) methods have been widely used in several management contexts. In public security, their use enhances managerial decision-making by considering the decision-maker’s preference structure and providing a multidimensional view of problems. However, methodological support for their applications in this field lacks clarity, including selecting appropriate methods, addressing pertinent problematics, and identifying alternatives and criteria. To address this gap, this article conducts a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to diagnose the state of the art and identify the main directions of the research in multicriteria models applied to public security management. The research methodology involves five main research questions, and the extraction and analysis of data from 51 articles selected through a structured filtering process. The analysis includes identifying the number of publications and citations, as well as listing the MCDM/A approaches and issues employed. Furthermore, the criteria used and the number of criteria considered are discussed, as well as the method employed. Finally, the identification of the main research directions in MCDM/A models applied to public security is presented. The findings suggest that prioritization and classification are common problematics, social criteria are frequently considered, and the AHP method is widely used, often employing fuzzy sets and hybrid models.

Suggested Citation

  • Jefferson Costa & Maisa Silva, 2024. "Multicriteria Decision-Making in Public Security: A Systematic Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:11:p:1754-:d:1408960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/11/1754/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/11/1754/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zoe Radnor & Nicola Bateman, 2016. "Debate: The development of a new discipline— public service operations management," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 246-248, May.
    2. Llamazares, Bonifacio, 2018. "An analysis of the generalized TODIM method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 1041-1049.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kedar Pandurang Joshi & Amol Dhaigude, 2021. "Revenue management for homestay with TODIM-integrated EMSR-b," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(2), pages 134-148, April.
    2. Víctor Blanco & Román Salmerón & Samuel Gómez-Haro, 2018. "A Multicriteria Selection System Based on Player Performance: Case Study—The Spanish ACB Basketball League," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1029-1046, December.
    3. Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua & Gomes, Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro, 2021. "Modeling multicriteria group decision making as games from enhanced pairwise comparisons," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    4. Zhe Chai & Yihan Zhang & Lanyi Wei & Junhui Liu & Yao Lu & Chunzheng Tian & Zhaoyuan Wu, 2024. "Value Evaluation Model of Multi-Temporal Energy Storage for Flexibility Provision in Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Yigit Kazancoglu & Cisem Lafci & Anil Kumar & Sunil Luthra & Jose Arturo Garza‐Reyes & Yalcin Berberoglu, 2024. "The role of agri‐food 4.0 in climate‐smart farming for controlling climate change‐related risks: A business perspective analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2788-2802, May.
    6. Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis & Virgilijus Skulskis, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Sustainable Selection of Insulation Materials in Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Akan Narabin & Phairoj Samutrak, 2023. "Teaching assistant selection in Thailand by using an extended VIKOR based on piecewise linear approximation of fuzzy numbers," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 33(3), pages 89-104.
    8. Du, Puliang & Chen, Zhong & Gong, Xiaomin, 2020. "Load response potential evaluation for distribution networks: A hybrid decision-making model with intuitionistic normal cloud and unknown weight information," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    9. Juliet Orji, Ifeyinwa & Ojadi, Frank & Kalu Okwara, Ukoha, 2022. "The nexus between e-commerce adoption in a health pandemic and firm performance: The role of pandemic response strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 616-635.
    10. Dan Bumblauskas & Amy Igou & Salil Kalghatgi & Cole Wetzel, 2022. "Public Policy and Broader Applications for the Use of Text Analytics During Pandemics," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 568-581, November.
    11. Zixue Guo & Sijia Liu, 2023. "Study on the Selection of Pharmaceutical E-Commerce Platform Considering Bounded Rationality under Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Marte D.-Q. Holmemo & Jonas A. Ingvaldsen & Jos Benders, 2017. "Debate: Changing to Lean public services," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 5-6, January.
    13. Huchang Liao & Xiaomei Mi & Zeshui Xu, 2020. "A survey of decision-making methods with probabilistic linguistic information: bibliometrics, preliminaries, methodologies, applications and future directions," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 81-134, March.
    14. Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua & Gomes, Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro, 2021. "A novel version of the TODIM method based on the exponential model of prospect theory: The ExpTODIM method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 1042-1055.
    15. Sandra G. Leggat & Pauline Stanton & Greg J. Bamber & Timothy Bartram & Richard Gough & Ruth Ballardie & Kathy GermAnn & Amrik Sohal, 2018. ": 4P recommendations for implementing change, from research in hospitals," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 45-50, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:11:p:1754-:d:1408960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.