IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i10p1519-d1393780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model with Loss Aversion for Contractor Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Huixia Huang

    (Business School, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China
    Research Centre for Innovation & Economic Transformation, Research Institute of Social Sciences in Guangdong Province, Foshan 528225, China)

  • Chi Zhou

    (School of Management, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Hepu Deng

    (School of Accounting, Information Systems and Supply Chain, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

Abstract

Evaluating and selecting appropriate contractors is critical to the success of specific construction projects in the building industry. Existing approaches for addressing this problem are unsatisfactory due to the ignorance of the multi-dimensional nature of the evaluation process and inappropriate consideration of existent risks. This study presents a DEA game cross-efficiency model with loss aversion for evaluating and selecting specific contractors. The competitiveness of the evaluation process is modeled using game theory with respect to the adoption of the cross-efficiency model. The attitude of the decision maker toward risks is tackled with the use of loss aversion, which is a phenomenon formalized in prospect theory. As a result, the proposed approach can adequately screen available contractors through prequalification and adequately consider the attitude of the decision maker toward risks, leading to effective decisions being made. An example is presented to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed model in evaluating and selecting appropriate contractors for specific construction projects. The results show that the proposed model is effective and efficient in producing a unique solution for contractor selection through appropriate modeling of the multi-dimensional contractor selection process and adequate consideration of the competition between the contractors and the attitude of the decision maker toward risks in practical situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Huixia Huang & Chi Zhou & Hepu Deng, 2024. "A DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model with Loss Aversion for Contractor Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:10:p:1519-:d:1393780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/10/1519/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/10/1519/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:10:p:1519-:d:1393780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.