IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i10p1430-d1389811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost Evaluation for Capacity Planning Based on Patients’ Pathways via Semi-Markov Reward Modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Chatzimichail

    (Department of Mathematics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Pavlos Kolias

    (Department of Mathematics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Alexandra Papadopoulou

    (Department of Mathematics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

In the present paper, we develop a non-homogeneous semi-Markov reward model, deriving expressions for a healthcare system’s expected structure along with the expected costs generated by medical services and patients’ holding times in the states. We provide a novel definition and investigation for states’ availability, which is critical for capacity planning based on service demand in an environment of limited resources. The study is based on patients’ mobility through hospital care, where each patient spends an amount of time in every state of the hospital (emergency room, short-term acute care, hospitalization, surgery room, and intensive care unit). Multiple outcomes, such as discharge or death, can also be taken into account. We envisage a situation where any discharges are immediately replaced by a number of new admissions that carry on the pathways of the patients who exit. By assuming an expanding system, the new idea of states’ inflows is considered due to new patients who create pathways through hospital care, along with internal entrances. The theoretical results are illustrated numerically with simulated hospital data informed by aggregated public data of the Greek public health sector. The framework can be used for both strategic planning and cost evaluation purposes for hospital resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Chatzimichail & Pavlos Kolias & Alexandra Papadopoulou, 2024. "Cost Evaluation for Capacity Planning Based on Patients’ Pathways via Semi-Markov Reward Modelling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:10:p:1430-:d:1389811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/10/1430/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/10/1430/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. J. Faddy & S. I. McClean, 1999. "Analysing data on lengths of stay of hospital patients using phase‐type distributions," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 311-317, October.
    2. K Cooper & S C Brailsford & R Davies, 2007. "Choice of modelling technique for evaluating health care interventions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(2), pages 168-176, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuta Kanai & Hideaki Takagi, 2021. "Markov chain analysis for the neonatal inpatient flow in a hospital," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 92-116, March.
    2. K Cooper & R Davies & J Raftery & P Roderick, 2008. "Use of a coronary heart disease simulation model to evaluate the costs and effectiveness of drugs for the prevention of heart disease," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(9), pages 1173-1181, September.
    3. Olivier Ethgen & Baudouin Standaert, 2012. "Population–versus Cohort–Based Modelling Approaches," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 171-181, March.
    4. Markus Kraus & Marion Rauner & Sigrun Schwarz, 2010. "Hospital management games: a taxonomy and extensive review," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 18(4), pages 567-591, December.
    5. Nikolaos Stavropoulos & Alexandra Papadopoulou & Pavlos Kolias, 2021. "Evaluating the Efficiency of Off-Ball Screens in Elite Basketball Teams via Second-Order Markov Modelling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-13, August.
    6. Marion Rauner & Michaela Schaffhauser-Linzatti & Helmut Niessner, 2012. "Resource planning for ambulance services in mass casualty incidents: a DES-based policy model," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 254-269, September.
    7. Thomas Rohleder & Peter Lewkonia & Diane Bischak & Paul Duffy & Rosa Hendijani, 2011. "Using simulation modeling to improve patient flow at an outpatient orthopedic clinic," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 135-145, June.
    8. Douglas Mapel & Melissa Roberts, 2012. "New Clinical Insights into Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Their Implications for Pharmacoeconomic Analyses," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(10), pages 869-885, October.
    9. McClean, Sally & Gillespie, Jennifer & Garg, Lalit & Barton, Maria & Scotney, Bryan & Kullerton, Ken, 2014. "Using phase-type models to cost stroke patient care across health, social and community services," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 190-199.
    10. S J E Taylor & T Eldabi & G Riley & R J Paul & M Pidd, 2009. "Simulation modelling is 50! Do we need a reality check?," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 69-82, May.
    11. Jesús Isaac Vázquez-Serrano & Rodrigo E. Peimbert-García & Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón, 2021. "Discrete-Event Simulation Modeling in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-20, November.
    12. Viana, J. & Brailsford, S.C. & Harindra, V. & Harper, P.R., 2014. "Combining discrete-event simulation and system dynamics in a healthcare setting: A composite model for Chlamydia infection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(1), pages 196-206.
    13. Staff, Marta & Mustafee, Navonil & Shenker, Natalie & Weaver, Gillian, 2024. "Ensuring neonatal human milk provision: A framework for estimating potential demand for donor human milk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(2), pages 642-655.
    14. K J Cairns & A H Marshall & F Kee, 2011. "Using simulation to assess cardiac first-responder schemes exhibiting stochastic and spatial complexities," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(6), pages 982-991, June.
    15. Joost van Rosmalen & Mehlika Toy & James F. O’Mahony, 2013. "A Mathematical Approach for Evaluating Markov Models in Continuous Time without Discrete-Event Simulation," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(6), pages 767-779, August.
    16. Eren Demir & Thierry Chaussalet, 2011. "Capturing the re-admission process: focus on time window," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 951-960, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:10:p:1430-:d:1389811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.