IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i8p1795-d1119470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonlinear Techniques and Ridge Regression as a Combined Approach: Carcinoma Identification Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Gerardo Alfonso Perez

    (Biocomp Group, Institute of Advanced Materials (INAM), Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castelló de la Plana, Spain)

  • Raquel Castillo

    (Biocomp Group, Institute of Advanced Materials (INAM), Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castelló de la Plana, Spain)

Abstract

As more genetic information becomes available, such as DNA methylation levels, it becomes increasingly important to have techniques to analyze such data in the context of cancers such as anal and cervical carcinomas. In this paper, we present an algorithm that differentiates between healthy control patients and individuals with anal and cervical carcinoma, using as an input DNA methylation data. The algorithm used a combination of ridge regression and neural networks for the classification task, achieving high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. The relationship between methylation levels and carcinoma could in principle be rather complex, particularly given that a large number of CpGs could be involved. Therefore, nonlinear techniques (machine learning) were used. Machine learning techniques (nonlinear) can be used to model linear processes, but the opposite (linear techniques simulating nonlinear models) would not likely generate accurate forecasts. The feature selection process is carried out using a combination of prefiltering, ridge regression and nonlinear modeling (artificial neural networks). The model selected 13 CpGs from a total of 450,000 CpGs available per patient with 171 patients in total. The model was also tested for robustness and compared to other more complex models that generated less precise classifications. The model obtained (testing dataset) an accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 97.69%, 95.02% and 98.26%, respectively. The reduction of the dimensionality of the data, from 450,000 to 13 CpGs per patient, likely also reduced the likelihood of overfitting, which is a very substantial risk in this type of modelling. All 13 CpGs individually generated classification forecasts less accurate than the proposed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerardo Alfonso Perez & Raquel Castillo, 2023. "Nonlinear Techniques and Ridge Regression as a Combined Approach: Carcinoma Identification Case Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:8:p:1795-:d:1119470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/8/1795/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/8/1795/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerardo Alfonso Perez & Raquel Castillo, 2022. "Identification of Systemic Sclerosis through Machine Learning Algorithms and Gene Expression," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hao Wang & Anthony Bellotti & Rong Qu & Ruibin Bai, 2024. "Discrete-Time Survival Models with Neural Networks for Age–Period–Cohort Analysis of Credit Risk," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-26, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:8:p:1795-:d:1119470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.