IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i5p1258-d1088472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Statistics Show Differences between Distance Estimations of 3D Objects in the Traffic Environment Using Glances, Side View Mirrors, and Camera Display?

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandar Trifunović

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Tijana Ivanišević

    (Academy of Professional Studies Sumadija, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia)

  • Svetlana Čičević

    (Academy of Professional Studies Sumadija, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia)

  • Sreten Simović

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro)

  • Vedran Vukšić

    (P.E. GSP Belgrade, Knjeginje Ljubice 29, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Živana Slović

    (Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia)

Abstract

The driver’s task in traffic is to evaluate traffic situations and act in accordance with the estimate. One of the most common causes of road crashes is “incorrect estimated of the traffic situation”. Correct perception of surroundings is one of the prerequisites for safe and successful driving. To investigate the mentioned issue, the authors of this paper conducted an experimental study with the aim of determining what affects the estimation of the object distance. In contrast to previous studies known from the available literature, our study presents experimental research of the estimated distance of 3D stimuli in three environments by direct observation, a rear-view mirror, and a camera display in a vehicle. One-hundred-and-sixty-four participants participated in the experiment. The research results show statistically significant differences in the estimation of the distance of 3D objects for different colors. Participants, for the largest number of stimuli, best estimate the distance from direct observation than through the rear-view mirror, while they make the most mistakes when estimating the distance of 3D objects using the camera display in a vehicle. On the other hand, in all described conditions, the respondents estimated the distance to the blue and green objects with the most significant errors.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandar Trifunović & Tijana Ivanišević & Svetlana Čičević & Sreten Simović & Vedran Vukšić & Živana Slović, 2023. "Do Statistics Show Differences between Distance Estimations of 3D Objects in the Traffic Environment Using Glances, Side View Mirrors, and Camera Display?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:5:p:1258-:d:1088472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/5/1258/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/5/1258/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sreten Simović & Tijana Ivanišević & Aleksandar Trifunović & Svetlana Čičević & Dragan Taranović, 2021. "What Affects the E-Bicycle Speed Perception in the Era of Eco-Sustainable Mobility: A Driving Simulator Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Grandi, Benedetta & Cardinali, Maria Grazia, 2022. "Colours and price offers: How different price communications can affect sales and customers’ perceptions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nenad Marković & Tijana Ivanišević & Svetlana Čičević & Aleksandar Trifunović, 2024. "Fuzzy Logic Model for Assessing Accident Proneness Based on Passenger Vehicle Speed in Real and Virtual Traffic Conditions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Shengliang & Guo, Dinghao & Li, Xiaodong, 2023. "The rhythm of shopping: How background music placement in live streaming commerce affects consumer purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Jenkins, Michael & Lustosa, Lucio & Chia, Victoria & Wildish, Sarah & Tan, Maria & Hoornweg, Daniel & Lloyd, Meghann & Dogra, Shilpa, 2022. "What do we know about pedal assist E-bikes? A scoping review to inform future directions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 25-37.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:5:p:1258-:d:1088472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.