IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i4p1006-d1070323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Survey on Evaluation Metrics for Machine Translation

Author

Listed:
  • Seungjun Lee

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jungseob Lee

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Hyeonseok Moon

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea)

  • Chanjun Park

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
    Upstage, Yongin 16942, Republic of Korea)

  • Jaehyung Seo

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea)

  • Sugyeong Eo

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea)

  • Seonmin Koo

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea)

  • Heuiseok Lim

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

The success of Transformer architecture has seen increased interest in machine translation (MT). The translation quality of neural network-based MT transcends that of translations derived using statistical methods. This growth in MT research has entailed the development of accurate automatic evaluation metrics that allow us to track the performance of MT. However, automatically evaluating and comparing MT systems is a challenging task. Several studies have shown that traditional metrics (e.g., BLEU, TER) show poor performance in capturing semantic similarity between MT outputs and human reference translations. To date, to improve performance, various evaluation metrics have been proposed using the Transformer architecture. However, a systematic and comprehensive literature review on these metrics is still missing. Therefore, it is necessary to survey the existing automatic evaluation metrics of MT to enable both established and new researchers to quickly understand the trend of MT evaluation over the past few years. In this survey, we present the trend of automatic evaluation metrics. To better understand the developments in the field, we provide the taxonomy of the automatic evaluation metrics. Then, we explain the key contributions and shortcomings of the metrics. In addition, we select the representative metrics from the taxonomy, and conduct experiments to analyze related problems. Finally, we discuss the limitation of the current automatic metric studies through the experimentation and our suggestions for further research to improve the automatic evaluation metrics.

Suggested Citation

  • Seungjun Lee & Jungseob Lee & Hyeonseok Moon & Chanjun Park & Jaehyung Seo & Sugyeong Eo & Seonmin Koo & Heuiseok Lim, 2023. "A Survey on Evaluation Metrics for Machine Translation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:1006-:d:1070323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/4/1006/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/4/1006/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:1006-:d:1070323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.