Author
Listed:
- Tiancheng Zhang
(School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China)
- Hanyu Mao
(School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China)
- Hengyu Liu
(School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China)
- Yingjie Liu
(School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China)
- Minghe Yu
(School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China)
- Wenhui Wu
(School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China)
- Ge Yu
(School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China)
- Baoze Wei
(Department of Energy Technology, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark)
- Yajuan Guan
(Department of Energy Technology, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark)
Abstract
Knowledge proficiency refers to the extent to which students master knowledge and reflects their cognitive status. To accurately assess knowledge proficiency, various pedagogical theories have emerged. Bloom’s cognitive theory, proposed in 1956 as one of the classic theories, follows the cognitive progression from foundational to advanced levels, categorizing cognition into multiple tiers including “knowing”, “understanding”, and “application”, thereby constructing a hierarchical cognitive structure. This theory is predominantly employed to frame the design of teaching objectives and guide the implementation of teaching activities. Additionally, due to the large number of students in real-world online education systems, the time required to calculate knowledge proficiency is significantly high and unacceptable. To ensure the applicability of this method in large-scale systems, there is a substantial demand for the design of a parallel prediction model to assess knowledge proficiency. The research in this paper is grounded in Bloom’s Cognitive theory, and a Bloom Cognitive Diagnosis Parallel Model (BloomCDM) for calculating knowledge proficiency is designed based on this theory. The model is founded on the concept of matrix decomposition. In the theoretical modeling phase, hierarchical and inter-hierarchical assumptions are initially established, leading to the abstraction of the mathematical model. Subsequently, subject features are mapped onto the three-tier cognitive space of “knowing”, “understanding”, and “applying” to derive the posterior distribution of the target parameters. Upon determining the objective function of the model, both student and topic characteristic parameters are computed to ascertain students’ knowledge proficiency. During the modeling process, in order to formalize the mathematical expressions of “understanding” and “application”, the notions of “knowledge group” and “higher-order knowledge group” are introduced, along with a parallel method for identifying the structure of higher-order knowledge groups. Finally, the experiments in this paper validate that the model can accurately diagnose students’ knowledge proficiency, affirming the scientific and meaningful integration of Bloom’s cognitive hierarchy in knowledge proficiency assessment.
Suggested Citation
Tiancheng Zhang & Hanyu Mao & Hengyu Liu & Yingjie Liu & Minghe Yu & Wenhui Wu & Ge Yu & Baoze Wei & Yajuan Guan, 2023.
"Parallel Prediction Method of Knowledge Proficiency Based on Bloom’s Cognitive Theory,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-23, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:24:p:5002-:d:1302496
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:24:p:5002-:d:1302496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.