IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i21p4531-d1273593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and Analysis of Heuristic Intelligent Optimization Algorithms for PSO, WDO, GWO and OOBO

Author

Listed:
  • Xiufeng Huang

    (Laboratory of Vibration and Noise, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China
    National Key Laboratory of Vibration and Noise on Ship, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China)

  • Rongwu Xu

    (Laboratory of Vibration and Noise, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China
    National Key Laboratory of Vibration and Noise on Ship, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China)

  • Wenjing Yu

    (Laboratory of Vibration and Noise, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China
    National Key Laboratory of Vibration and Noise on Ship, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China)

  • Shiji Wu

    (Laboratory of Vibration and Noise, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China
    National Key Laboratory of Vibration and Noise on Ship, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China)

Abstract

In order to comprehensively evaluate and analyze the effectiveness of various heuristic intelligent optimization algorithms, this research employed particle swarm optimization, wind driven optimization, grey wolf optimization, and one-to-one-based optimizer as the basis. It applied 22 benchmark test functions to conduct a comparison and analysis of performance for these algorithms, considering descriptive statistics such as convergence speed, accuracy, and stability. Additionally, time and space complexity calculations were employed, alongside the nonparametric Friedman test, to further assess the algorithms. Furthermore, an investigation into the impact of control parameters on the algorithms’ output was conducted to compare and analyze the test results under different algorithms. The experimental findings demonstrate the efficacy of the aforementioned approaches in comprehensively analyzing and comparing the performance on different types of intelligent optimization algorithms. These results illustrate that algorithm performance can vary across different test functions. The one-to-one-based optimizer algorithm exhibited superior accuracy, stability, and relatively lower complexity.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiufeng Huang & Rongwu Xu & Wenjing Yu & Shiji Wu, 2023. "Evaluation and Analysis of Heuristic Intelligent Optimization Algorithms for PSO, WDO, GWO and OOBO," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-42, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:21:p:4531-:d:1273593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/21/4531/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/21/4531/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:21:p:4531-:d:1273593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.