IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i21p4439-d1267953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Adaptive Ant Colony Optimization for Solving Large-Scale Traveling Salesman Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Kezong Tang

    (School of Information Engineering, Jingdezhen Ceramic University, Jingdezhen 333403, China)

  • Xiong-Fei Wei

    (School of Information Engineering, Jingdezhen Ceramic University, Jingdezhen 333403, China)

  • Yuan-Hao Jiang

    (School of Computer Science and Technology, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

  • Zi-Wei Chen

    (School of Information Engineering, Jingdezhen Ceramic University, Jingdezhen 333403, China)

  • Lihua Yang

    (School of Information Engineering, Jingdezhen Ceramic University, Jingdezhen 333403, China)

Abstract

The ant colony algorithm faces dimensional catastrophe problems when solving the large-scale traveling salesman problem, which leads to unsatisfactory solution quality and convergence speed. To solve this problem, an adaptive ant colony optimization for large-scale traveling salesman problem (AACO-LST) is proposed. First, AACO-LST improves the state transfer rule to make it adaptively adjust with the population evolution, thus accelerating its convergence speed; then, the 2-opt operator is used to locally optimize the part of better ant paths to further optimize the solution quality of the proposed algorithm. Finally, the constructed adaptive pheromone update rules can significantly improve the search efficiency and prevent the algorithm from falling into local optimal solutions or premature stagnation. The simulation based on 45 traveling salesman problem instances shows that AACO-LST improves the solution quality by 79% compared to the ant colony system (ACS), and in comparison with other algorithms, the PE of AACO-LST is not more than 1% and the Err is not more than 2%, which indicates that AACO-LST can find high-quality solutions with high stability. Finally, the convergence speed of the proposed algorithm was tested. The data shows that the average convergence speed of AACO-LST is more than twice that of the comparison algorithm. The relevant code can be found on our project homepage.

Suggested Citation

  • Kezong Tang & Xiong-Fei Wei & Yuan-Hao Jiang & Zi-Wei Chen & Lihua Yang, 2023. "An Adaptive Ant Colony Optimization for Solving Large-Scale Traveling Salesman Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-26, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:21:p:4439-:d:1267953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/21/4439/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/21/4439/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marshall L. Fisher, 1994. "Optimal Solution of Vehicle Routing Problems Using Minimum K-Trees," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 626-642, August.
    2. Sedighizadeh, Davoud & Masehian, Ellips & Sedighizadeh, Mostafa & Akbaripour, Hossein, 2021. "GEPSO: A new generalized particle swarm optimization algorithm," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 194-212.
    3. E. L. Lawler & D. E. Wood, 1966. "Branch-and-Bound Methods: A Survey," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 699-719, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Coşar Gözükırmızı & Metin Demiralp, 2019. "Solving ODEs by Obtaining Purely Second Degree Multinomials via Branch and Bound with Admissible Heuristic," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Amine Lamine & Mahdi Khemakhem & Brahim Hnich & Habib Chabchoub, 2016. "Solving constrained optimization problems by solution-based decomposition search," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 672-695, October.
    3. Derigs, U. & Kaiser, R., 2007. "Applying the attribute based hill climber heuristic to the vehicle routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 719-732, March.
    4. Weiqiang Pan & Zhilong Shan & Ting Chen & Fangjiong Chen & Jing Feng, 2016. "Optimal pilot design for OFDM systems with non-contiguous subcarriers based on semi-definite programming," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 297-305, October.
    5. César Rego, 1998. "A Subpath Ejection Method for the Vehicle Routing Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(10), pages 1447-1459, October.
    6. Sana Jawarneh & Salwani Abdullah, 2015. "Sequential Insertion Heuristic with Adaptive Bee Colony Optimisation Algorithm for Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-23, July.
    7. R. Baldacci & E. Hadjiconstantinou & A. Mingozzi, 2004. "An Exact Algorithm for the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem Based on a Two-Commodity Network Flow Formulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 723-738, October.
    8. Martinhon, Carlos & Lucena, Abilio & Maculan, Nelson, 2004. "Stronger K-tree relaxations for the vehicle routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(1), pages 56-71, October.
    9. Drexl, Andreas, 1990. "Scheduling of project networks by job assignment," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 247, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    10. Yi-Feng Hung & Wei-Chih Chen, 2011. "A heterogeneous cooperative parallel search of branch-and-bound method and tabu search algorithm," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 133-148, September.
    11. Fox, B. L. & Lenstra, J. K. & Rinnooy Kan, A. H. G. & Schrage, L. E., 1977. "Branching From The Largest Upper Bound: Folklore And Facts," Econometric Institute Archives 272158, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    12. Paredes-Belmar, Germán & Montero, Elizabeth & Lüer-Villagra, Armin & Marianov, Vladimir & Araya-Sassi, Claudio, 2022. "Vehicle routing for milk collection with gradual blending: A case arising in Chile," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1403-1416.
    13. González-Parra, Gilberto & Villanueva-Oller, Javier & Navarro-González, F.J. & Ceberio, Josu & Luebben, Giulia, 2024. "A network-based model to assess vaccination strategies for the COVID-19 pandemic by using Bayesian optimization," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    14. Amirsaman Kheirkhah & HamidReza Navidi & Masume Messi Bidgoli, 2016. "A bi-level network interdiction model for solving the hazmat routing problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(2), pages 459-471, January.
    15. Drexl, Michael & Schneider, Michael, 2015. "A survey of variants and extensions of the location-routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(2), pages 283-308.
    16. Joaquín Pacheco & Rafael Caballero & Manuel Laguna & Julián Molina, 2013. "Bi-Objective Bus Routing: An Application to School Buses in Rural Areas," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 397-411, August.
    17. Paredes-Belmar, Germán & Marianov, Vladimir & Bronfman, Andrés & Obreque, Carlos & Lüer-Villagra, Armin, 2016. "A milk collection problem with blending," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 26-43.
    18. Thomas L. Morin & Roy E. Marsten, 1974. "Brand-and-Bound Strategies for Dynamic Programming," Discussion Papers 106, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    19. Baghersad, Milad & Emadikhiav, Mohsen & Huang, C. Derrick & Behara, Ravi S., 2023. "Modularity maximization to design contiguous policy zones for pandemic response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 99-112.
    20. Marshall Fisher, 2007. "Strengthening the Empirical Base of Operations Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 368-382, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:21:p:4439-:d:1267953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.