IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i17p3771-d1231645.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Medical Image Segmentation: Ground Truth Optimization through Evaluating Uncertainty in Expert Annotations

Author

Listed:
  • Georgios Athanasiou

    (Artificial Intelligence Research Institute (IIIA), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Campus Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Josep Lluis Arcos

    (Artificial Intelligence Research Institute (IIIA), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Campus Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Jesus Cerquides

    (Artificial Intelligence Research Institute (IIIA), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Campus Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

The surge of supervised learning methods for segmentation lately has underscored the critical role of label quality in predicting performance. This issue is prevalent in the domain of medical imaging, where high annotation costs and inter-observer variability pose significant challenges. Acquiring labels commonly involves multiple experts providing their interpretations of the “true” segmentation labels, each influenced by their individual biases. The blind acceptance of these noisy labels as the ground truth restricts the potential effectiveness of segmentation algorithms. Here, we apply coupled convolutional neural network approaches to a small-sized real-world dataset of bovine cumulus oocyte complexes. This is the first time these methods have been applied to a real-world annotation medical dataset, since they were previously tested only on artificially generated labels of medical and non-medical datasets. This dataset is crucial for healthy embryo development. Its application revealed an important challenge: the inability to effectively learn distinct confusion matrices for each expert due to large areas of agreement. In response, we propose a novel method that focuses on areas of high uncertainty. This approach allows us to understand the individual characteristics better, extract their behavior, and use this insight to create a more sophisticated ground truth using maximum likelihood. These findings contribute to the ongoing discussion of leveraging machine learning algorithms for medical image segmentation, particularly in scenarios involving multiple human annotators.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgios Athanasiou & Josep Lluis Arcos & Jesus Cerquides, 2023. "Enhancing Medical Image Segmentation: Ground Truth Optimization through Evaluating Uncertainty in Expert Annotations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:17:p:3771-:d:1231645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/17/3771/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/17/3771/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:17:p:3771-:d:1231645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.