IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i17p3757-d1230409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economic Value of Dual-Token Blockchains

Author

Listed:
  • Nicola Dimitri

    (Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy)

Abstract

It is standard for blockchain platforms to issue native tokens, or crytpocurrencies, that users must own to operate within the platform. Some blockchains, however, decided to issue two tokens, establishing a dual system, with one token typically for governance and the other for implementing functions on the blockchain, such as executing transactions or smart contracts. Therefore, the two tokens are used for different activities. Typically, owning the governance tokens gives the right to receive the other token for free, as a reward for participating in the blockchain decision-making and voting processes. However, both tokens can also be traded on some exchange nodes, which means that platform functions could be implemented even without owning governance tokens. In this paper, we discuss some economic fundamentals of dual-token blockchain platforms—in particular, how to establish their economic value and the market relative attractiveness of the two tokens. We do so by introducing some simple numerical indicators, based on prices, and traded circulating monetary quantities. Such indicators, which are meant to reflect the platform’s view on the tokens’ market desirability, could be computed in real time and used to support the platform’s policy making.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicola Dimitri, 2023. "The Economic Value of Dual-Token Blockchains," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:17:p:3757-:d:1230409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/17/3757/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/17/3757/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shen, Zhuyi & Wang, Shibo & Yang, Jinqiang, 2023. "A note on the dynamic adoption and valuation theory in tokenomics," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    2. Lo, Yuen C. & Medda, Francesca, 2020. "Assets on the blockchain: An empirical study of Tokenomics," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aggelos Kiayias & Philip Lazos & Paolo Penna, 2024. "Single-token vs Two-token Blockchain Tokenomics," Papers 2403.15429, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ernest Barceló & Katarina Dimić-Mišić & Monir Imani & Vesna Spasojević Brkić & Michael Hummel & Patrick Gane, 2023. "Regulatory Paradigm and Challenge for Blockchain Integration of Decentralized Systems: Example—Renewable Energy Grids," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    2. Oscar Lage & María Saiz-Santos & José Manuel Zarzuelo, 2022. "Decentralized platform economy: emerging blockchain-based decentralized platform business models," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1707-1723, September.
    3. Kensuke Ito, 2024. "Cryptoeconomics and Tokenomics as Economics: A Survey with Opinions," Papers 2407.15715, arXiv.org.
    4. Muneer M. Alshater & Mayank Joshipura & Rim El Khoury & Nohade Nasrallah, 2023. "Initial Coin Offerings: a Hybrid Empirical Review," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 891-908, October.
    5. Kumar, Shashank & Raut, Rakesh D. & Agrawal, Nishant & Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel & Sharma, Mahak & Daim, Tugrul, 2022. "Integrated blockchain and internet of things in the food supply chain: Adoption barriers," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    6. Lo, Yuen & Medda, Francesca, 2020. "Uniswap and the rise of the decentralized exchange," MPRA Paper 103925, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Volker Brühl, 2021. "Decentralised Finance — wie die Tokenisierung die Finanzindustrie verändert [Decentralised Finance (DeFi) — How Tokenisation is Changing the Financial Industry]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(8), pages 629-637, August.
    8. David Rozas & Antonio Tenorio-Fornés & Silvia Díaz-Molina & Samer Hassan, 2021. "When Ostrom Meets Blockchain: Exploring the Potentials of Blockchain for Commons Governance," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    9. Shen, Zhuyi & Wang, Shibo & Yang, Jinqiang, 2023. "Robust adoption and valuation in tokenomics," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    10. Zhao, Yuan & Liu, Nan & Li, Wanpeng, 2022. "Industry herding in crypto assets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    dual-token blockchains; economic value;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:17:p:3757-:d:1230409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.