IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i16p3601-d1221018.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient Harris Hawk Optimization (HHO)-Based Framework for Accurate Skin Cancer Prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Walaa N. Ismail

    (Department of Management Information Systems, College of Business Administration, Al Yamamah University, Riyadh 11512, Saudi Arabia
    Faculty of Computers and Information, Minia University, Minia 61519, Egypt)

  • Hessah A. Alsalamah

    (College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 4545, Saudi Arabia
    Computer Engineering Department, College of Engineering and Architecture, Al Yamamah University, Riyadh 11512, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The prediction of skin cancer poses a number of challenges due to the differences in visual characteristics between melanoma, basal cell carcinomas, and squamous cell carcinomas. These visual differences pose difficulties for models in discerning subtle features and patterns accurately. However, a remarkable breakthrough in image analysis using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has emerged, specifically in the identification of skin cancer from images. Unfortunately, manually designing such neural architectures is prone to errors and consumes substantial time. It has become increasingly popular to design and fine-tune neural networks by using metaheuristic algorithms that are based on natural phenomena. A nature-inspired algorithm is a powerful alternative to traditional algorithms for solving problems, particularly in complex optimization tasks. One such algorithm, the Harris hawk optimization (HHO), has demonstrated promise in automatically identifying the most appropriate solution across a wide range of possibilities, making it suitable for solving complex optimization problems. The purpose of this study is to introduce a novel automated architecture called “HHOForSkin” that combines the power of convolutional neural networks with meta-heuristic optimization techniques. The HHOForSkin framework uses an innovative custom CNN architecture with 26 layers for the analysis of medical images. In addition, a Harris hawk optimization algorithm (HHO) is used to fine-tune the developed model for multiple skin cancer classification problems. The developed model achieves an average accuracy of 99.1% and 98.93% F1 score using a publicly available skin cancer dataset. These results position the developed optimization-based skin cancer detection strategy at the forefront, offering the highest accuracy for seven-class classification problems compared to related works.

Suggested Citation

  • Walaa N. Ismail & Hessah A. Alsalamah, 2023. "Efficient Harris Hawk Optimization (HHO)-Based Framework for Accurate Skin Cancer Prediction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-26, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:16:p:3601-:d:1221018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/16/3601/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/16/3601/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haijun Liu & Rui Zhou & Xiaoyong Zhong & Yuan Yao & Weifeng Shan & Jing Yuan & Jian Xiao & Yan Ma & Kunpeng Zhang & Zhibin Wang, 2024. "Multi-Strategy Enhanced Crested Porcupine Optimizer: CAPCPO," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-41, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:16:p:3601-:d:1221018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.