IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i10p2263-d1145047.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on the Choice of Online Marketplace Co-Opetition Strategy Considering the Promotional Behavior of a Store on an E-Commerce Platform

Author

Listed:
  • Tao Wang

    (School of Business Administration, Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, Guangzhou 510320, China)

Abstract

The huge traffic of e-commerce platforms provides a wide market for stores, but the fierce competition among stores for onsite traffic increases the cost of onsite promotion for stores, and it also reduces the effectiveness of promotion. Therefore, more and more stores on e-commerce platforms are using content platforms for offsite promotion. In the face of stores’ onsite and offsite promotion behaviors, the choice of competition and cooperation strategies among participants in the promotion process is the key to solving the problem of increasing traffic. Accordingly, this paper constructs an onsite and offsite promotion decision model consisting of an e-commerce platform, a store on the e-commerce platform, and a content platform, and it compares the results based on the decentralized decision situation, centralized decision situation, and promotion investment sharing situation. In addition, some results are presented in more detail in the form of numerical analysis. The results show that the promotion investment sharing does not change the level of onsite promotion investment, but the centralized decision makes the onsite promotion investment decrease; promotion investment sharing and centralized decision scenarios increase the promotion investment of the e-commerce platform and the content platform. When the sum of the parts of promotion investments shared by the store and the content platform for the e-commerce platform is relatively small, each participant will be willing to participate in the promotion investment sharing agreement. We believe that this study will provide important implications for the resolution of stores’ traffic dilemmas on e-commerce platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao Wang, 2023. "A Study on the Choice of Online Marketplace Co-Opetition Strategy Considering the Promotional Behavior of a Store on an E-Commerce Platform," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:10:p:2263-:d:1145047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/10/2263/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/10/2263/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Attila Ambrus & Emilio Calvano & Markus Reisinger, 2016. "Either or Both Competition: A "Two-Sided" Theory of Advertising with Overlapping Viewerships," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 8(3), pages 189-222, August.
    2. Avi Goldfarb & Catherine E. Tucker, 2011. "Privacy Regulation and Online Advertising," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 57-71, January.
    3. Matthieu Bouvard & Raphaël Levy, 2018. "Two-Sided Reputation in Certification Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(10), pages 4755-4774, October.
    4. Chen, Jing & Pun, Hubert & Li, Wei, 2018. "Using online channel to defer the launch of discount retailing store," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 96-115.
    5. Yu (Jeffrey) Hu & Jiwoong Shin & Zhulei Tang, 2016. "Incentive Problems in Performance-Based Online Advertising Pricing: Cost per Click vs. Cost per Action," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(7), pages 2022-2038, July.
    6. Chen, Pingping & Zhao, Ruiqing & Yan, Yingchen & Li, Xiang, 2020. "Promotional pricing and online business model choice in the presence of retail competition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    7. Ru, Jun & Wang, Yunzeng, 2010. "Consignment contracting: Who should control inventory in the supply chain?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 760-769, March.
    8. Yang, Wei & Xiao, Baichun & Wu, Lifang, 2020. "Learning and pricing models for repeated generalized second-price auction in search advertising," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 696-711.
    9. Shan Wang & Shi Zheng & Lida Xu & Dezheng Li & Huan Meng, 2008. "A literature review of electronic marketplace research: Themes, theories and an integrative framework," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(5), pages 555-571, November.
    10. Grieger, Martin, 2003. "Electronic marketplaces: A literature review and a call for supply chain management research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 280-294, January.
    11. J. Yannis Bakos, 1997. "Reducing Buyer Search Costs: Implications for Electronic Marketplaces," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(12), pages 1676-1692, December.
    12. Alexandre de Cornière & Romain de Nijs, 2016. "Online advertising and privacy," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 47(1), pages 48-72, February.
    13. Amin Sayedi & Kinshuk Jerath & Kannan Srinivasan, 2014. "Competitive Poaching in Sponsored Search Advertising and Its Strategic Impact on Traditional Advertising," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 586-608, July.
    14. Yannis Bakos & Erik Brynjolfsson, 2000. "Bundling and Competition on the Internet," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 63-82, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tao Wang & Shi-Xiao Wang, 2022. "International Manufacturer’s Online Marketplace Choice Considering Behavior-Based Pricing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Hana Choi & Carl F. Mela & Santiago R. Balseiro & Adam Leary, 2020. "Online Display Advertising Markets: A Literature Review and Future Directions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 556-575, June.
    3. Anna D’Annunzio & Antonio Russo, 2020. "Ad Networks and Consumer Tracking," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(11), pages 5040-5058, November.
    4. Anna D’Annunzio & Antonio Russo, 2024. "Intermediaries in the Online Advertising Market," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 33-53, January.
    5. Duan, Yongrui & Liu, Peng & Feng, Yixuan, 2022. "Pricing strategies of two-sided platforms considering privacy concerns," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    6. Avi Goldfarb & Shane M. Greenstein & Catherine E. Tucker, 2015. "Introduction to "Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy"," NBER Chapters, in: Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy, pages 1-17, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Veronica Marotta & Yue Wu & Kaifu Zhang & Alessandro Acquisti, 2022. "The Welfare Impact of Targeted Advertising Technologies," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 131-151, March.
    8. Esther Gal-Or & Ronen Gal-Or & Nabita Penmetsa, 2018. "The Role of User Privacy Concerns in Shaping Competition Among Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 698-722, September.
    9. Alex Jiyoung Kim & Subramanian Balachander, 2023. "Coordinating traditional media advertising and online advertising in brand marketing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(6), pages 1865-1879, June.
    10. Caleb S. Fuller, 2019. "Is the market for digital privacy a failure?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 180(3), pages 353-381, September.
    11. Avi Goldfarb, 2014. "What is Different About Online Advertising?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 44(2), pages 115-129, March.
    12. W. Jason Choi & Amin Sayedi, 2019. "Learning in Online Advertising," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(4), pages 584-608, July.
    13. Gebauer, Judith & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2013. "Joining Supply and Demand Conditions of IT Enabled Change: Toward an Economic Theory of Inter-firm Modulation," Working Papers 13-0100, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    14. Ravi Bapna & Jui Ramaprasad & Galit Shmueli & Akhmed Umyarov, 2016. "One-Way Mirrors in Online Dating: A Randomized Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(11), pages 3100-3122, November.
    15. Ziliang Deng & Peter W Liesch & Zeyu Wang, 2021. "Deceptive signaling on globalized digital platforms: Institutional hypnosis and firm internationalization," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(6), pages 1096-1120, August.
    16. Alexandre de Cornière, 2016. "Search Advertising," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 8(3), pages 156-188, August.
    17. Caleb S. Fuller, 2018. "Privacy law as price control," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 225-250, April.
    18. Vomfell, Lara & Stahl, Florian & Schomm, Fabian & Vossen, Gottfried, 2015. "A classification framework for data marketplaces," ERCIS Working Papers 23, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    19. Shan Wang & Shi Zheng & Lida Xu & Dezheng Li & Huan Meng, 2008. "A literature review of electronic marketplace research: Themes, theories and an integrative framework," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(5), pages 555-571, November.
    20. Hongchang Wang & Benjamin Williams & Karen Xie & Wei Chen, 2024. "Quality Differentiation and Matching Performance in Peer-to-Peer Markets: Evidence from Airbnb Plus," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(7), pages 4260-4282, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:10:p:2263-:d:1145047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.