Author
Listed:
- Eman Alruwaili
(Department of Mathematics, Northern Border University, Arar 73222, Saudi Arabia
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA)
- Jing Li
(Department of Mathematical Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA)
Abstract
Inverse problems arise in many areas of science and engineering, such as geophysics, biology, and medical imaging. One of the main imaging modalities that have seen a huge increase in recent years is the noninvasive, nonionizing, and radiation-free imaging technique of electrical impedance tomography (EIT). Other advantages of such a technique are the low cost and ubiquitousness. An imaging technique is used to recover the internal conductivity of a body using measurements from electrodes from the body’s surface. The standard procedure is to obtain measurements by placing electrodes in the body and measuring conductivity inside the object. A current with low frequency is applied on the electrodes below a threshold, rendering the technique harmless for the body, especially when applied to living organisms. As with many inverse problems, EIT suffers from ill-posedness, i.e., the reconstruction of internal conductivity is a severely ill-posed inverse problem and typically yields a poor-quality solution. Moreover, the desired solution has step changes in the electrical properties that are typically challenging to be reconstructed by traditional smoothing regularization methods. To counter this difficulty, one solves a regularized problem that is better conditioned than the original problem by imposing constraints on the regularization term. The main contribution of this work is to develop a general ℓ p regularized method with total variation to solve the nonlinear EIT problem through a iteratively reweighted majorization–minimization strategy combined with the Gauss–Newton approach. The main idea is to majorize the linearized EIT problem at each iteration and minimize through a quadratic tangent majorant. Simulated numerical examples from complete electrode model illustrate the effectiveness of our approach.
Suggested Citation
Eman Alruwaili & Jing Li, 2022.
"Majorization–Minimization Total Variation Solution Methods for Electrical Impedance Tomography,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:9:p:1469-:d:803691
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:9:p:1469-:d:803691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.