IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i6p965-d773473.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Choice of Time–Frequency Representations of Non-Stationary Signals Affects Machine Learning Model Accuracy: A Case Study on Earthquake Detection from LEN-DB Data

Author

Listed:
  • Marko Njirjak

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Erik Otović

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Dario Jozinović

    (Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, 00143 Rome, Italy
    Department of Science, Roma Tre University, 00154 Rome, Italy
    Now at Swiss Seismological Service (SED) at ETH Zurich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.)

  • Jonatan Lerga

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
    Center for Artificial Intelligence and Cybersecurity, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Goran Mauša

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
    Center for Artificial Intelligence and Cybersecurity, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Alberto Michelini

    (Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, 00143 Rome, Italy)

  • Ivan Štajduhar

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
    Center for Artificial Intelligence and Cybersecurity, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

Abstract

Non-stationary signals are often analyzed using raw waveform data or spectrograms of those data; however, the possibility of alternative time–frequency representations being more informative than the original data or spectrograms is yet to be investigated. This paper tested whether alternative time–frequency representations could be more informative for machine learning classification of seismological data. The mentioned hypothesis was evaluated by training three well-established convolutional neural networks using nine time–frequency representations. The results were compared to the base model, which was trained on the raw waveform data. The signals that were used in the experiment are three-component seismogram instances from the Local Earthquakes and Noise DataBase (LEN-DB). The results demonstrate that Pseudo Wigner–Ville and Wigner–Ville time–frequency representations yield significantly better results than the base model, while spectrogram and Margenau–Hill perform significantly worse ( p < 0.01). Interestingly, the spectrogram, which is often used in signal analysis, had inferior performance when compared to the base model. The findings presented in this research could have notable impacts in the fields of geophysics and seismology as the phenomena that were previously hidden in the seismic noise are now more easily identified. Furthermore, the results indicate that applying Pseudo Wigner–Ville or Wigner–Ville time–frequency representations could result in a large increase in earthquakes in the catalogs and lessen the need to add new stations with an overall reduction in the costs. Finally, the proposed approach of extracting valuable information through time–frequency representations could be applied in other domains as well, such as electroencephalogram and electrocardiogram signal analysis, speech recognition, gravitational waves investigation, and so on.

Suggested Citation

  • Marko Njirjak & Erik Otović & Dario Jozinović & Jonatan Lerga & Goran Mauša & Alberto Michelini & Ivan Štajduhar, 2022. "The Choice of Time–Frequency Representations of Non-Stationary Signals Affects Machine Learning Model Accuracy: A Case Study on Earthquake Detection from LEN-DB Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:6:p:965-:d:773473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/6/965/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/6/965/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:6:p:965-:d:773473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.