IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i3p310-d728751.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Machine Reading Comprehension with Multi-Task Learning and Self-Training

Author

Listed:
  • Jianquan Ouyang

    (College of Computer Cyberspace Security, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China)

  • Mengen Fu

    (College of Computer Cyberspace Security, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China)

Abstract

Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) is an AI challenge that requires machines to determine the correct answer to a question based on a given passage, in which extractive MRC requires extracting an answer span to a question from a given passage, such as the task of span extraction. In contrast, non-extractive MRC infers answers from the content of reference passages, including Yes/No question answering to unanswerable questions. Due to the specificity of the two types of MRC tasks, researchers usually work on one type of task separately, but real-life application situations often require models that can handle many different types of tasks in parallel. Therefore, to meet the comprehensive requirements in such application situations, we construct a multi-task fusion training reading comprehension model based on the BERT pre-training model. The model uses the BERT pre-training model to obtain contextual representations, which is then shared by three downstream sub-modules for span extraction, Yes/No question answering, and unanswerable questions, next we fuse the outputs of the three sub-modules into a new span extraction output and use the fused cross-entropy loss function for global training. In the training phase, since our model requires a large amount of labeled training data, which is often expensive to obtain or unavailable in many tasks, we additionally use self-training to generate pseudo-labeled training data to train our model to improve its accuracy and generalization performance. We evaluated the SQuAD2.0 and CAIL2019 datasets. The experiments show that our model can efficiently handle different tasks. We achieved 83.2EM and 86.7F1 scores on the SQuAD2.0 dataset and 73.0EM and 85.3F1 scores on the CAIL2019 dataset.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianquan Ouyang & Mengen Fu, 2022. "Improving Machine Reading Comprehension with Multi-Task Learning and Self-Training," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:3:p:310-:d:728751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/3/310/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/3/310/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:3:p:310-:d:728751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.