IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i24p4773-d1004469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Criteria for the Degree of Pathological Remodeling of the Aortic Duct

Author

Listed:
  • Eugene Talygin

    (Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, 121552 Moscow, Russia)

  • Alexander Gorodkov

    (Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, 121552 Moscow, Russia
    Lomonosov Institute of Fine Chemical Technologies, Russian Technological University, Vernadsky Prospect, 86, 119571 Moscow, Russia)

  • Teona Tibua

    (Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, 121552 Moscow, Russia)

  • Leo Bockeria

    (Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, 121552 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

Analysis of the properties of the aorta was carried out by numerous researchers using several parameters. However, the general laws of change in the dynamic geometry of the aortic flow channel in connection with the hydrodynamics of the swirling blood flow have not been studied properly. Therefore, at present, attempts to correct various diseases are carried out based on the location of the aneurysm, and not in accordance with the general patterns of changes in the dynamic geometry of the entire aortic channel. For a proper understanding of the aortic flow channel remodeling mechanisms, it is necessary to determine the quantitative parameters that formalize the geometry of this channel. The geometric shape of the aorta primarily depends on the hydrodynamics of the flow inside the aortic flow channel, which is the only source of force impact on its walls. The main result of the present study was that we obtained the new quantitative parameters that characterize the normal aorta and the degree of its shape deviations caused by pathological changes of the aortic duct. These parameters were calculated based on the software processing of the three-dimensional aortic reconstruction in normal conditions and in the case of differently localized aortic aneurysm.

Suggested Citation

  • Eugene Talygin & Alexander Gorodkov & Teona Tibua & Leo Bockeria, 2022. "Quantitative Criteria for the Degree of Pathological Remodeling of the Aortic Duct," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:24:p:4773-:d:1004469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/24/4773/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/24/4773/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xi Li & Ge Zhao & Jian Zhang & Zhiquan Duan & Shijie Xin, 2013. "Prevalence and Trends of the Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Epidemic in General Population - A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eva L Leemans & Tineke P Willems & Cornelis H Slump & Maarten J van der Laan & Clark J Zeebregts, 2018. "Additional value of biomechanical indices based on CTa for rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-12, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:24:p:4773-:d:1004469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.