Author
Listed:
- Fernando Sánchez Lasheras
(Faculty of Sciences, University of Oviedo, 33007 Oviedo, Spain
Institute of Space Sciences and Technologies of Asturias (ICTEA), University of Oviedo, 33004 Oviedo, Spain)
- José Curbelo
(Faculty of Medicine, University Francisco de Vitoria, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain)
- Jaime Baladrón Romero
(Cursos Intensivos MIR Asturias, c/Quintana, 11A, 1, 33009 Oviedo, Spain)
- Alberto García Guerrero
(Cursos Intensivos MIR Asturias, c/Quintana, 11A, 1, 33009 Oviedo, Spain)
- Carmen Peñalver San Cristóbal
(Cursos Intensivos MIR Asturias, c/Quintana, 11A, 1, 33009 Oviedo, Spain)
- Tomás Villacampa
(Clínica Oftalmológica Villacampa, c/La Cámara, 15, 33401 Avilés, Spain)
- Paula Jiménez Fonseca
(Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Avenida Roma, 33011 Oviedo, Spain)
Abstract
This research explores the results that an examinee would obtain if taking a multiple-choice questions test in which they have doubts as to what the true answer is among different options. This problem is analyzed by making use of combinatorics and analytical and sampling methodologies. The Spanish exam through which doctors become medical specialists has been employed as an example. Although it is difficult to imagine that there are candidates who respond randomly to all the questions of such an exam, it is common that they may doubt over what the correct answer is in some questions. The exam consists of a total of 210 multiple-choice questions with 4 answer options. The cut-off mark is calculated as one-third of the average of the 10 best marks in the exam. According to the results obtained, it is possible to affirm that in the case of doubting over two or three of the four possible answers in certain group questions, answering all of them will in most cases lead to obtaining a positive result. Moreover, in the case of doubting between two answer options in all the questions of the MIR test, it would be possible to exceed the cut-off mark.
Suggested Citation
Fernando Sánchez Lasheras & José Curbelo & Jaime Baladrón Romero & Alberto García Guerrero & Carmen Peñalver San Cristóbal & Tomás Villacampa & Paula Jiménez Fonseca, 2022.
"Answering Multiple-Choice Questions in Which Examinees Doubt What the True Answer Is among Different Options,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-22, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:23:p:4543-:d:990221
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:23:p:4543-:d:990221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.