IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i22p4185-d967334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence Maximization under Fairness Budget Distribution in Online Social Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Bich-Ngan T. Nguyen

    (Faculty of Information Technology, Ho Chi Minh City University of Food Industry, 140 Le Trong Tan Street, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
    Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, 17.listopadu 15/2172, 708 33 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Phuong N. H. Pham

    (Faculty of Information Technology, Ho Chi Minh City University of Food Industry, 140 Le Trong Tan Street, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
    Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, 17.listopadu 15/2172, 708 33 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Van-Vang Le

    (Faculty of Information Technology, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam)

  • Václav Snášel

    (Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, 17.listopadu 15/2172, 708 33 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

Abstract

In social influence analysis, viral marketing, and other fields, the influence maximization problem is a fundamental one with critical applications and has attracted many researchers in the last decades. This problem asks to find a k -size seed set with the largest expected influence spread size. Our paper studies the problem of fairness budget distribution in influence maximization, aiming to find a seed set of size k fairly disseminated in target communities. Each community has certain lower and upper bounded budgets, and the number of each community’s elements is selected into a seed set holding these bounds. Nevertheless, resolving this problem encounters two main challenges: strongly influential seed sets might not adhere to the fairness constraint, and it is an NP-hard problem. To address these shortcomings, we propose three algorithms ( FBIM 1 , FBIM 2 , and FBIM 3 ). These algorithms combine an improved greedy strategy for selecting seeds to ensure maximum coverage with the fairness constraints by generating sampling through a Reverse Influence Sampling framework. Our algorithms provide a ( 1 / 2 − ϵ ) -approximation of the optimal solution, and require O k T log ( 8 + 2 ϵ ) n ln 2 δ + ln ( k n ) ϵ 2 , O k T log n ϵ 2 k , and O T ϵ log k ϵ log n ϵ 2 k complexity, respectively. We conducted experiments on real social networks. The result shows that our proposed algorithms are highly scalable while satisfying theoretical assurances, and that the coverage ratios with respect to the target communities are larger than those of the state-of-the-art alternatives; there are even cases in which our algorithms reaches 100 % coverage with respect to target communities. In addition, our algorithms are feasible and effective even in cases involving big data; in particular, the results of the algorithms guarantee fairness constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Bich-Ngan T. Nguyen & Phuong N. H. Pham & Van-Vang Le & Václav Snášel, 2022. "Influence Maximization under Fairness Budget Distribution in Online Social Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-26, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:22:p:4185-:d:967334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/22/4185/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/22/4185/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gengxin Sun & Chih-Cheng Chen, 2021. "Influence Maximization Algorithm Based on Reverse Reachable Set," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:22:p:4185-:d:967334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.