IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i18p3340-d915458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which Number System Is “Best” for Describing Empirical Reality?

Author

Listed:
  • Matt Visser

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand)

Abstract

Eugene Wigner’s much-discussed notion of the “unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics” as applied to describing the physics of empirical reality is simultaneously both trivial and profound. After all, the relevant mathematics was (in the first instance) originally developed in order to be useful in describing empirical reality. On the other hand, certain aspects of the mathematical superstructure have by now taken on a life of their own, with at least some features of the mathematical superstructure greatly exceeding anything that can be directly probed or verified, or even justified, by empirical experiment. Specifically, I wish to raise the possibility that the real number system (with its nevertheless pragmatically very useful tools of real analysis and mathematically rigorous notions of differentiation and integration) may nevertheless constitute a “wrong turn” (a “sub-optimal” choice) when it comes to modelling empirical reality. Without making any definitive recommendation, I shall discuss several reasonably well-developed alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Matt Visser, 2022. "Which Number System Is “Best” for Describing Empirical Reality?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-10, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:18:p:3340-:d:915458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/18/3340/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/18/3340/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:18:p:3340-:d:915458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.