IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i17p3088-d899480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A High-Precision Surrogate Modeling Method Based on Parallel Multipoint Expected Improvement Point Infill Criteria for Complex Simulation Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Shande Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    Hubei Innovation Institute of Mobile Emergency Equipment Manufacturing, Hubei Institute of Specialty Vehicle, Suizhou 441300, China)

  • Jian Wen

    (Hubei Innovation Institute of Mobile Emergency Equipment Manufacturing, Hubei Institute of Specialty Vehicle, Suizhou 441300, China)

  • Jun Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Weiqi Liu

    (Hubei Innovation Institute of Mobile Emergency Equipment Manufacturing, Hubei Institute of Specialty Vehicle, Suizhou 441300, China
    School of Mechanical Engineering, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China)

  • Shuai Yuan

    (State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

In order to overcome the problem of the low fitting accuracy of the expected improvement point infill criteria (EI) and the improved expected improvement point infill criteria (IEI), a high-precision surrogate modeling method based on the parallel multipoint expected improvement point infill criteria (PMEI) is presented in this paper for solving large-scale complex simulation problems. The PMEI criterion takes full advantage of the strong global search ability of the EI criterion and the local search ability of the IEI criterion to improve the overall accuracy of the fitting function. In the paper, the detailed steps of the PMEI method are introduced firstly, which can add multiple sample points in a single iteration. At the same time, in the process of constructing the surrogate model, it is effective to avoid the problem of the low fitting accuracy caused by adding only one new sample point in each iteration of the EI and IEI criteria. The numerical examples of the classical one-dimensional function and two-dimensional function clearly demonstrate the accuracy of the fitting function of the proposed method. Moreover, the accuracy of the multi-objective optimization surrogate model of a truck cab constructed by the PMEI method is tested, which proves the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method in solving high-dimensional modeling problems. All these results confirm that the Kriging model developed by the PMEI method has high accuracy for low-dimensional problems or high-dimensional complex problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Shande Li & Jian Wen & Jun Wang & Weiqi Liu & Shuai Yuan, 2022. "A High-Precision Surrogate Modeling Method Based on Parallel Multipoint Expected Improvement Point Infill Criteria for Complex Simulation Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:17:p:3088-:d:899480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/17/3088/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/17/3088/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jack Kleijnen & Wim Beers & Inneke Nieuwenhuyse, 2012. "Expected improvement in efficient global optimization through bootstrapped kriging," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 59-73, September.
    2. Cadini, F. & Santos, F. & Zio, E., 2014. "An improved adaptive kriging-based importance technique for sampling multiple failure regions of low probability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 109-117.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhan, Hongyou & Xiao, Ning-Cong & Ji, Yuxiang, 2022. "An adaptive parallel learning dependent Kriging model for small failure probability problems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    2. Xu, Jun & Wang, Ding, 2019. "Structural reliability analysis based on polynomial chaos, Voronoi cells and dimension reduction technique," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 329-340.
    3. Songhao Wang & Szu Hui Ng & William Benjamin Haskell, 2022. "A Multilevel Simulation Optimization Approach for Quantile Functions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 569-585, January.
    4. Menz, Morgane & Gogu, Christian & Dubreuil, Sylvain & Bartoli, Nathalie & Morio, Jérôme, 2020. "Adaptive coupling of reduced basis modeling and Kriging based active learning methods for reliability analyses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    5. Li, Wenxiong & Geng, Rong & Chen, Suiyin, 2024. "CSP-free adaptive Kriging surrogate model method for reliability analysis with small failure probability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    6. Cao, Runan & Sun, Zhili & Wang, Jian & Guo, Fanyi, 2022. "A single-loop reliability analysis strategy for time-dependent problems with small failure probability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    7. Puppo, L. & Pedroni, N. & Maio, F. Di & Bersano, A. & Bertani, C. & Zio, E., 2021. "A Framework based on Finite Mixture Models and Adaptive Kriging for Characterizing Non-Smooth and Multimodal Failure Regions in a Nuclear Passive Safety System," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    8. Mehdad, E. & Kleijnen, Jack P.C., 2014. "Classic Kriging versus Kriging with Bootstrapping or Conditional Simulation : Classic Kriging's Robust Confidence Intervals and Optimization (Revised version of CentER DP 2013-038)," Other publications TiSEM 4915047b-afe4-4fc7-8a1c-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Zio, E., 2018. "The future of risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 176-190.
    10. Gaspar, B. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2017. "Adaptive surrogate model with active refinement combining Kriging and a trust region method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 277-291.
    11. Jian, Wang & Zhili, Sun & Qiang, Yang & Rui, Li, 2017. "Two accuracy measures of the Kriging model for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 494-505.
    12. Bansal, Sahil & Cheung, Sai Hung, 2017. "On the evaluation of multiple failure probability curves in reliability analysis with multiple performance functions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 583-594.
    13. Ling, Chunyan & Lu, Zhenzhou & Zhu, Xianming, 2019. "Efficient methods by active learning Kriging coupled with variance reduction based sampling methods for time-dependent failure probability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 23-35.
    14. Turati, Pietro & Pedroni, Nicola & Zio, Enrico, 2017. "Simulation-based exploration of high-dimensional system models for identifying unexpected events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 317-330.
    15. Morales-Enciso, Sergio & Branke, Juergen, 2015. "Tracking global optima in dynamic environments with efficient global optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 744-755.
    16. Sun, Zhili & Wang, Jian & Li, Rui & Tong, Cao, 2017. "LIF: A new Kriging based learning function and its application to structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 152-165.
    17. Tosoni, E. & Salo, A. & Govaerts, J. & Zio, E., 2019. "Comprehensiveness of scenarios in the safety assessment of nuclear waste repositories," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 561-573.
    18. Jiang, Chen & Qiu, Haobo & Yang, Zan & Chen, Liming & Gao, Liang & Li, Peigen, 2019. "A general failure-pursuing sampling framework for surrogate-based reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 47-59.
    19. Zhang, Yu & Dong, You & Xu, Jun, 2023. "An accelerated active learning Kriging model with the distance-based subdomain and a new stopping criterion for reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    20. Keshtegar, Behrooz & Chakraborty, Subrata, 2018. "An efficient-robust structural reliability method by adaptive finite-step length based on Armijo line search," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 195-206.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:17:p:3088-:d:899480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.