IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i16p2868-d885734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Case-Based Reasoning and Attribute Features Mining for Posting-Popularity Prediction: A Case Study in the Online Automobile Community

Author

Listed:
  • Tingting Zhao

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Jie Lin

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Zhenyu Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    School of Automation, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China)

Abstract

Social media is in a dynamic environment of real-time interaction, and users generate overwhelming and high-dimensional information at all times. A new case-based reasoning (CBR) method combined with attribute features mining for posting-popularity prediction in online communities is explored from the perspective of imitating human knowledge reasoning in artificial intelligence. To improve the quality of algorithms for CBR approach retrieval and extraction and describe high-dimensional network information in the form of the CBR case, the idea of intrinsically interpretable attribute features is proposed. Based on the theory and research of the social network combined with computer technology of data analysis and text mining, useful information could be successfully collected from massive network information, from which the simple information features and covered information features are summarized and extracted to explain the popularity of the online automobile community. We convert complex network information into a set of interpretable attribute features of different data types and construct the CBR approach presentation system of network postings. Moreover, this paper constructs the network posting cases database suitable for the social media network environment. To deal with extreme situations caused by network application scenarios, trimming suggestions and methods for similar posting cases of the network community have been provided. The case study shows that the developed posting popularity prediction method is suitable for the complex social network environment and can effectively support decision makers to fully use the experience and knowledge of historical cases and find an excellent solution to forecasting popularity in the network community.

Suggested Citation

  • Tingting Zhao & Jie Lin & Zhenyu Zhang, 2022. "Case-Based Reasoning and Attribute Features Mining for Posting-Popularity Prediction: A Case Study in the Online Automobile Community," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-28, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:16:p:2868-:d:885734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/16/2868/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/16/2868/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oded Netzer & Ronen Feldman & Jacob Goldenberg & Moshe Fresko, 2012. "Mine Your Own Business: Market-Structure Surveillance Through Text Mining," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 521-543, May.
    2. Jinhui He & Huirong Zhang & Zhenyu Zhang & Jiaping Zhang & Ching-Feng Wen, 2021. "Probabilistic Linguistic Three-Way Multi-Attibute Decision Making for Hidden Property Evaluation of Judgment Debtor," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-16, May.
    3. Liao, Shu-Hsien & Widowati, Retno & Hsieh, Yu-Chieh, 2021. "Investigating online social media users’ behaviors for social commerce recommendations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guenwoo Lee & Ayu Pratiwi & Farikhah & Aya Suzuki & Takashi Kurosaki, 2023. "Do online communities of practice complement or substitute conventional agricultural extension services? Evidence from Indonesian shrimp farmers' participation in a Facebook group," Working Papers e183, Tokyo Center for Economic Research.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gal-Tzur, Ayelet & Grant-Muller, Susan M. & Kuflik, Tsvi & Minkov, Einat & Nocera, Silvio & Shoor, Itay, 2014. "The potential of social media in delivering transport policy goals," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 115-123.
    2. Yu Ding & Wayne S. DeSarbo & Dominique M. Hanssens & Kamel Jedidi & John G. Lynch & Donald R. Lehmann, 2020. "The past, present, and future of measurement and methods in marketing analysis," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 175-186, September.
    3. Johnson, Nathan & Turnbull, Benjamin & Reisslein, Martin, 2022. "Social media influence, trust, and conflict: An interview based study of leadership perceptions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Daniel M. Ringel & Bernd Skiera, 2016. "Visualizing Asymmetric Competition Among More Than 1,000 Products Using Big Search Data," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 511-534, May.
    5. Karen Ruckman & Nilesh Saraf & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2015. "Market Positioning by IT Service Vendors Through Imitation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 100-126, March.
    6. Balázs Kovács, 2024. "The Turing test of online reviews: Can we tell the difference between human-written and GPT-4-written online reviews?," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 651-666, December.
    7. Jiyeon Hong & Paul R. Hoban, 2022. "Writing More Compelling Creative Appeals: A Deep Learning-Based Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(5), pages 941-965, September.
    8. Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea, 2023. "A Brief History of Service Innovation: The evolution of past, present, and future of service innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    9. Xuan Gong & Yunchan Zhu & Rizwan Ali & Ruijin Guo, 2019. "Capturing Associations and Sustainable Competitiveness of Brands from Social Tags," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Todd Pezzuti & James M. Leonhardt, 2023. "What’s not to like? Negations in brand messages increase consumer engagement," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 675-694, May.
    11. Schneider, Matthew J. & Gupta, Sachin, 2016. "Forecasting sales of new and existing products using consumer reviews: A random projections approach," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 243-256.
    12. Shu-Heng Chen & Ragupathy Venkatachalam, 2017. "Information aggregation and computational intelligence," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 231-252, June.
    13. Dominik Gutt & Jürgen Neumann & Steffen Zimmermann & Dennis Kundisch & Jianqing Chen, 2018. "Design of Review Systems - A Strategic Instrument to shape Online Review Behavior and Economic Outcomes," Working Papers Dissertations 42, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    14. Uttara Ananthakrishnan & Davide Proserpio & Siddhartha Sharma, 2023. "I Hear You: Does Quality Improve with Customer Voice?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 1143-1161, November.
    15. Gaurav Sabnis & Rajdeep Grewal, 2015. "Cable News Wars on the Internet: Competition and User-Generated Content," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 301-319, June.
    16. Carlson, Keith & Kopalle, Praveen K. & Riddell, Allen & Rockmore, Daniel & Vana, Prasad, 2023. "Complementing human effort in online reviews: A deep learning approach to automatic content generation and review synthesis," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 54-74.
    17. Daniel Blaseg & Christian Schulze & Bernd Skiera, 2020. "Consumer Protection on Kickstarter," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 211-233, January.
    18. Li, Xi & Shi, Mengze & Wang, Xin (Shane), 2019. "Video mining: Measuring visual information using automatic methods," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 216-231.
    19. Maria Antonietta Raimondo & Stefania Farace & Gaetano Nino Miceli, 2018. "User-Generated Systems of Signs and Meanings in Product Customization: Taxonomies and Research Directions," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 61-83.
    20. Gensler, Sonja & Oehring, Karlo & Wiesel, Thorsten, 2024. "Reported and communicated shifts in strategic emphasis and firm performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 220-240.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:16:p:2868-:d:885734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.