IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i15p2763-d879862.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stationary Conditions and Characterizations of Solution Sets for Interval-Valued Tightened Nonlinear Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Kin Keung Lai

    (International Business School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Shashi Kant Mishra

    (Department of Mathematics, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Sanjeev Kumar Singh

    (Department of Mathematics, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Mohd Hassan

    (Department of Mathematics, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

In this paper, we obtain characterizations of solution sets of the interval-valued mathematical programming problems with switching constraints. Stationary conditions which are weaker than the standard Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions need to be discussed in order to find the necessary optimality conditions. We introduce corresponding weak, Mordukhovich, and strong stationary conditions for the corresponding interval-valued mathematical programming problems with switching constraints (IVPSC) and interval-valued tightened nonlinear problems (IVTNP), because the W-stationary condition of IVPSC is equivalent to Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions of the IVTNP. Furthermore, we use strong stationary conditions to characterize the several solutions sets for IVTNP, in which the last ones are particular solutions sets for IVPSC at the same time, because the feasible set of tightened nonlinear problems (IVTNP) is a subset of the feasible set of the mathematical programs with switching constraints (IVPSC).

Suggested Citation

  • Kin Keung Lai & Shashi Kant Mishra & Sanjeev Kumar Singh & Mohd Hassan, 2022. "Stationary Conditions and Characterizations of Solution Sets for Interval-Valued Tightened Nonlinear Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:15:p:2763-:d:879862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/15/2763/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/15/2763/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeyakumar, V. & Lee, G.M. & Dinh, N., 2006. "Characterizations of solution sets of convex vector minimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(3), pages 1380-1395, November.
    2. S. K. Mishra & B. B. Upadhyay & Le Thi Hoai An, 2014. "Lagrange Multiplier Characterizations of Solution Sets of Constrained Nonsmooth Pseudolinear Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 160(3), pages 763-777, March.
    3. V. Jeyakumar & G. M. Lee & G. Li, 2015. "Characterizing Robust Solution Sets of Convex Programs under Data Uncertainty," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 407-435, February.
    4. V. Jeyakumar & G. M. Lee & N. Dinh, 2004. "Lagrange Multiplier Conditions Characterizing the Optimal Solution Sets of Cone-Constrained Convex Programs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 123(1), pages 83-103, October.
    5. S. K. Mishra & Vinay Singh & Vivek Laha, 2016. "On duality for mathematical programs with vanishing constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 243(1), pages 249-272, August.
    6. Vsevolod I. Ivanov, 2019. "Characterizations of Solution Sets of Differentiable Quasiconvex Programming Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 144-162, April.
    7. Xiangkai Sun & Kok Lay Teo & Liping Tang, 2019. "Dual Approaches to Characterize Robust Optimal Solution Sets for a Class of Uncertain Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 984-1000, September.
    8. Yogendra Pandey & Shashi Kant Mishra, 2016. "Duality for Nonsmooth Optimization Problems with Equilibrium Constraints, Using Convexificators," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 694-707, November.
    9. Hsien-Chung Wu, 2007. "The Karush-Kuhn-Tucker optimality conditions for the optimization problem with fuzzy-valued objective function," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 66(2), pages 203-224, October.
    10. Wu, Hsien-Chung, 2009. "The Karush-Kuhn-Tucker optimality conditions in multiobjective programming problems with interval-valued objective functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 49-60, July.
    11. X. M. Yang, 2009. "On Characterizing the Solution Sets of Pseudoinvex Extremum Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 537-542, March.
    12. T. Son & N. Dinh, 2008. "Characterizations of optimal solution sets of convex infinite programs," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(1), pages 147-163, July.
    13. Wu, Hsien-Chung, 2007. "The Karush-Kuhn-Tucker optimality conditions in an optimization problem with interval-valued objective function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(1), pages 46-59, January.
    14. Yan-Chao Liang & Jane J. Ye, 2021. "Optimality Conditions and Exact Penalty for Mathematical Programs with Switching Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 1-31, July.
    15. Yogendra Pandey & S. K. Mishra, 2018. "Optimality conditions and duality for semi-infinite mathematical programming problems with equilibrium constraints, using convexificators," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 549-564, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Savin Treanţă, 2022. "Variational Problems and Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-4, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vsevolod I. Ivanov, 2019. "Characterizations of Solution Sets of Differentiable Quasiconvex Programming Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 144-162, April.
    2. Xiangkai Sun & Kok Lay Teo & Liping Tang, 2019. "Dual Approaches to Characterize Robust Optimal Solution Sets for a Class of Uncertain Optimization Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 984-1000, September.
    3. Fabiola Roxana Villanueva & Valeriano Antunes Oliveira, 2022. "Necessary Optimality Conditions for Interval Optimization Problems with Functional and Abstract Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 194(3), pages 896-923, September.
    4. Rekha R. Jaichander & Izhar Ahmad & Krishna Kummari & Suliman Al-Homidan, 2022. "Robust Nonsmooth Interval-Valued Optimization Problems Involving Uncertainty Constraints," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Qingjie Hu & Jiguang Wang & Yu Chen, 2020. "New dualities for mathematical programs with vanishing constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(1), pages 233-255, April.
    6. Tadeusz Antczak, 2023. "Optimality conditions for invex nonsmooth optimization problems with fuzzy objective functions," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-21, March.
    7. V. Jeyakumar & G. M. Lee & G. Li, 2015. "Characterizing Robust Solution Sets of Convex Programs under Data Uncertainty," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 407-435, February.
    8. X. M. Yang, 2009. "On Characterizing the Solution Sets of Pseudoinvex Extremum Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 537-542, March.
    9. A. Rufián-Lizana & Y. Chalco-Cano & G. Ruiz-Garzón & H. Román-Flores, 2014. "On some characterizations of preinvex fuzzy mappings," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(2), pages 771-783, July.
    10. Shi, Fangfang & Ye, Guoju & Liu, Wei & Zhao, Dafang, 2023. "A class of nonconvex fuzzy optimization problems under granular differentiability concept," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 430-444.
    11. Hong-Zhi Wei & Chun-Rong Chen & Sheng-Jie Li, 2020. "Robustness Characterizations for Uncertain Optimization Problems via Image Space Analysis," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 186(2), pages 459-479, August.
    12. Zhang, Chuang-liang & Huang, Nan-jing & O’Regan, Donal, 2023. "On variational methods for interval-valued functions with some applications," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    13. Shaojie Zhang & Mahdi Hasanipanah & Biao He & Ahmad Safuan A. Rashid & Dmitrii Vladimirovich Ulrikh & Qiancheng Fang, 2022. "An Optimized Clustering Approach to Investigate the Main Features in Predicting the Punching Shear Capacity of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, October.
    14. R. Osuna-Gómez & B. Hernández-Jiménez & Y. Chalco-Cano & G. Ruiz-Garzón, 2018. "Different optimum notions for fuzzy functions and optimality conditions associated," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 177-193, June.
    15. Shashi Kant Mishra & Vivek Laha & Mohd Hassan, 2024. "On Quasiconvex Multiobjective Optimization and Variational Inequalities Using Greenberg–Pierskalla Based Generalized Subdifferentials," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 202(3), pages 1169-1186, September.
    16. Tran Van Su, 2023. "Optimality and duality for nonsmooth mathematical programming problems with equilibrium constraints," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 663-685, March.
    17. Agarwal, Deepika & Singh, Pitam & El Sayed, M.A., 2023. "The Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) optimality conditions for fuzzy-valued fractional optimization problems," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 861-877.
    18. Le Thanh Tung, 2022. "Karush–Kuhn–Tucker optimality conditions and duality for multiobjective semi-infinite programming with vanishing constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 1307-1334, April.
    19. Md Sadikur Rahman & Ali Akbar Shaikh & Irfan Ali & Asoke Kumar Bhunia & Armin Fügenschuh, 2021. "A Theoretical Framework for Optimality Conditions of Nonlinear Type-2 Interval-Valued Unconstrained and Constrained Optimization Problems Using Type-2 Interval Order Relations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-22, April.
    20. Sajjad Kazemi & Nader Kanzi, 2018. "Constraint Qualifications and Stationary Conditions for Mathematical Programming with Non-differentiable Vanishing Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 800-819, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:15:p:2763-:d:879862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.