Author
Listed:
- Dessislava Jereva
(Department of QSAR and Molecular Modelling, Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Petko Alov
(Department of QSAR and Molecular Modelling, Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Ivanka Tsakovska
(Department of QSAR and Molecular Modelling, Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria)
- Maria Angelova
(Department of QSAR and Molecular Modelling, Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria)
- Vassia Atanassova
(Department of Bioinformatics and Mathematical Modelling, Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria)
- Peter Vassilev
(Department of Bioinformatics and Mathematical Modelling, Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria)
- Nikolay Ikonomov
(Department of Software Engineering and Information Systems, Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria)
- Krassimir Atanassov
(Department of Bioinformatics and Mathematical Modelling, Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria)
- Ilza Pajeva
(Department of QSAR and Molecular Modelling, Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria)
- Tania Pencheva
(Department of QSAR and Molecular Modelling, Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria)
Abstract
(1) Background: In silico approaches to rational drug design are among the fastest evolving ones. Depending on the available structural information for the biomacromolecule and the small molecule, the in silico methods are classified as ligand- and structure-based. The latter predict ligand–receptor binding using 3D structures of both molecules, whose computational simulation is referred to as molecular docking. It aims at estimating the binding affinity (approximated by scoring function) and the ligand binding pose in the receptor’s active site, which postulates a key role of the scoring functions in molecular docking algorithms. This study focuses on the performance of different types of scoring functions implemented in molecular modelling software packages. (2) Methods: An InterCriteria analysis (ICrA) was applied to assess the performance of the scoring functions available in MOE, GOLD, SeeSAR, and AutoDock Vina software platforms. The InterCriteria analysis was developed to distinguish possible relations between pairs of criteria when multiple objects are considered. All 12 investigated scoring functions were tested by docking a set of protease inhibitors in the binding sites of two protein targets. The dataset consisted of 88 benzamidine-type compounds with experimentally measured inhibitory constants for thrombin and trypsin, which allows for the objective assessment of the scoring functions performance. The results generated by the molecular docking were subjected to ICrA in order to analyze both docking energies as approximations of the binding affinities and RMSDs (root-mean-square deviation) as measures of the experimental binding pose proximity between the compounds and the co-crystalized ligand, based on the atoms in the common scaffold. (3) Results: The results obtained for the best poses, the average of the best 5 or 30 poses retained after docking, were analyzed. A comparison with the experimentally observed inhibitory effects was also performed. The InterCriteria analysis application confirms that the performance of the scoring functions for the same dataset of ligands depends on the studied protein. The analysis reveals that none of the studied scoring functions is a good predictor of the compounds’ binding affinities for the considered protein targets. (4) Conclusion: In terms of this analysis, the investigated scoring functions do not produce equivalent results, which suggests the necessity for their combined use in consensus docking studies.
Suggested Citation
Dessislava Jereva & Petko Alov & Ivanka Tsakovska & Maria Angelova & Vassia Atanassova & Peter Vassilev & Nikolay Ikonomov & Krassimir Atanassov & Ilza Pajeva & Tania Pencheva, 2022.
"Application of InterCriteria Analysis to Assess the Performance of Scoring Functions in Molecular Docking Software Packages,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-17, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:15:p:2549-:d:868905
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:15:p:2549-:d:868905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.