Author
Listed:
- Hanshan Li
(School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an 710021, China)
- Xiaoqian Zhang
(School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an 710021, China)
- Jingxin Chen
(School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an 710021, China)
Abstract
The efficiency of target damage is to measure the effect of projectile attacks. Because there is antagonism at the intersection of projectiles and targets, it is very difficult to establish scientific damage assessment strategy model and a numerical calculation method. To scientifically evaluate the target damage effect when the projectile attacks the aircraft target, this paper introduces a game confrontation mechanism and proposes a numerical calculation method of aircraft target damage game strategy under the intersection confrontation. According to the theory of two-person non-cooperative games, the projectile is regarded as one of the players in the confrontation damage game, and the aircraft target is regarded as the other player. The damage gain model and gain function of the intersection confrontation of both sides are established. The effective expectation function and the minimum and maximum theorem are used to obtain the optimal Nash equilibrium solution of the game matrix strategy, and the Nash equilibrium point of the strategy space set is derived. Through calculation and comparative analysis, the results show that the optimal gain degree composed of the damage strategy selected by both the projectile and aircraft target under the Nash equilibrium solution brings the greatest gain. The proposed hybrid game strategy of damage assessment can be an effective reference for air combat decision making in the state of intersection confrontation.
Suggested Citation
Hanshan Li & Xiaoqian Zhang & Jingxin Chen, 2022.
"A Mathematical Modeling Approach of Target Damage Strategy on the Intersection Confrontation,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-20, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:14:p:2471-:d:863902
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:14:p:2471-:d:863902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.