IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i10p1743-d819375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Mathematical Model for Nonlinear Optimization Which Attempts Membership Functions to Address the Uncertainties

Author

Listed:
  • Palanivel Kaliyaperumal

    (Department of Mathematics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • Amrit Das

    (Department of Mathematics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India)

Abstract

The problem of optimizing an objective function that exists within the constraints of equality and inequality is addressed by nonlinear programming (NLP). A linear program exists if all of the functions are linear; otherwise, the problem is referred to as a nonlinear program. The development of highly efficient and robust linear programming (LP) algorithms and software, the advent of high-speed computers, and practitioners’ wider understanding and portability of mathematical modeling and analysis have all contributed to LP’s importance in solving problems in a variety of fields. However, due to the nature of the nonlinearity of the objective functions and any of the constraints, several practical situations cannot be completely explained or predicted as a linear program. Efforts to overcome such nonlinear problems quickly and efficiently have made rapid progress in recent decades. The past century has seen rapid progress in the field of nonlinear modeling of real-world problems. Because of the uncertainty that exists in all aspects of nature and human life, these models must be viewed through a system known as a fuzzy system. In this article, a new fuzzy model is proposed to address the vagueness presented in the nonlinear programming problems (NLPPs). The proposed model is described; its mathematical formulation and detailed computational procedure are shown with numerical illustrations by employing trapezoidal fuzzy membership functions (TFMFs). Here, the computational procedure has an important role in acquiring the optimum result by utilizing the necessary and sufficient conditions of the Lagrangian multipliers method in terms of fuzziness. Additionally, the proposed model is based on the previous research in the literature, and the obtained optimal result is justified with TFMFs. A model performance evaluation was completed with different set of inputs, followed by a comparison analysis, results and discussion. Lastly, the performance evaluation states that the efficiency level of the proposed model is of high impact. The code to solve the model is implemented in LINGO, and it comes with a collection of built-in solvers for various problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Palanivel Kaliyaperumal & Amrit Das, 2022. "A Mathematical Model for Nonlinear Optimization Which Attempts Membership Functions to Address the Uncertainties," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:10:p:1743-:d:819375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/10/1743/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/10/1743/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qin, X.S. & Huang, G.H. & Zeng, G.M. & Chakma, A. & Huang, Y.F., 2007. "An interval-parameter fuzzy nonlinear optimization model for stream water quality management under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(3), pages 1331-1357, August.
    2. Abdel-Rahman Hedar & Amira A. Allam & Wael Deabes, 2019. "Memory-Based Evolutionary Algorithms for Nonlinear and Stochastic Programming Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Zbigniew Michalewicz & George A. Vignaux & Matthew Hobbs, 1991. "A Nonstandard Genetic Algorithm for the Nonlinear Transportation Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 307-316, November.
    4. Chen, Shih-Pin, 2007. "Solving fuzzy queueing decision problems via a parametric mixed integer nonlinear programming method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 445-457, February.
    5. Bothina El-Sobky & Yousria Abo-Elnaga & Abd Allah A. Mousa & Mohamed A. El-Shorbagy, 2021. "Trust-Region Based Penalty Barrier Algorithm for Constrained Nonlinear Programming Problems: An Application of Design of Minimum Cost Canal Sections," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(13), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, S. & Huang, G.H., 2014. "An integrated approach for water resources decision making under interactive and compound uncertainties," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 32-40.
    2. Min Zhou & Shasha Lu & Shukui Tan & Danping Yan & Guoliang Ou & Dianfeng Liu & Xiang Luo & Yanan Li & Lu Zhang & Zuo Zhang & Xiangbo Zhu, 2017. "A stochastic equilibrium chance-constrained programming model for municipal solid waste management of the City of Dalian, China," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 199-218, January.
    3. Yang, Gaiqiang & Guo, Ping & Huo, Lijuan & Ren, Chongfeng, 2015. "Optimization of the irrigation water resources for Shijin irrigation district in north China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 82-98.
    4. Adane Abebaw Gessesse & Rajashree Mishra & Mitali Madhumita Acharya & Kedar Nath Das, 2020. "Genetic algorithm based fuzzy programming approach for multi-objective linear fractional stochastic transportation problem involving four-parameter Burr distribution," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(1), pages 93-109, February.
    5. Wang, S. & Huang, G.H., 2015. "A multi-level Taguchi-factorial two-stage stochastic programming approach for characterization of parameter uncertainties and their interactions: An application to water resources management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 572-581.
    6. Xu, Y. & Huang, G.H. & Qin, X.S. & Cao, M.F., 2009. "SRCCP: A stochastic robust chance-constrained programming model for municipal solid waste management under uncertainty," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 352-363.
    7. Li, Y.F. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Chen, X., 2010. "Energy and environmental systems planning under uncertainty--An inexact fuzzy-stochastic programming approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(10), pages 3189-3211, October.
    8. Wang, John & Yan, Ruiliang & Hollister, Kimberly & Zhu, Dan, 2008. "A historic review of management science research in China," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 919-932, December.
    9. Yang, Gaiqiang & Liu, Lei & Guo, Ping & Li, Mo, 2017. "A flexible decision support system for irrigation scheduling in an irrigation district in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 378-389.
    10. Manthos D. Delis & Pantelis Kazakis & Constantin Zopounidis, 2021. "Management Practices and Takeover Decisions," Working Papers 2021_10, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    11. Sun, Wei & Huang, Guo H. & Lv, Ying & Li, Gongchen, 2013. "Inexact joint-probabilistic chance-constrained programming with left-hand-side randomness: An application to solid waste management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(1), pages 217-225.
    12. Wang, Xingwei & Cai, Yanpeng & Chen, Jiajun & Dai, Chao, 2013. "A grey-forecasting interval-parameter mixed-integer programming approach for integrated electric-environmental management–A case study of Beijing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 334-344.
    13. Galioto, F., 2018. "The value of information for the management of water resources in agriculture: comparing the economic impact of alternative sources of information to schedule irrigation," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277384, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. George HALKOS & Georgia GALANI, 2014. "Cost Effectiveness Analysis in Reducing Nutrient Loading in Baltic and Black Seas A Review," Journal of Advanced Research in Management, ASERS Publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 28-51.
    15. Luis Fernando Grisales-Noreña & Oscar Danilo Montoya & Brandon Cortés-Caicedo & Farhad Zishan & Javier Rosero-García, 2023. "Optimal Power Dispatch of PV Generators in AC Distribution Networks by Considering Solar, Environmental, and Power Demand Conditions from Colombia," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    16. Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Guo, P. & Yang, Z.F. & Nie, S.L., 2010. "A dual-interval vertex analysis method and its application to environmental decision making under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 536-550, January.
    17. Abhijit Baidya & Uttam Kumar Bera, 2019. "New model for addressing supply chain and transport safety for disaster relief operations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 33-69, December.
    18. Galioto, Francesco & Chatzinikolaou, Parthena & Raggi, Meri & Viaggi, Davide, 2020. "The value of information for the management of water resources in agriculture: Assessing the economic viability of new methods to schedule irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    19. H. Zhu & G. Huang & P. Guo & X. Qin, 2009. "A Fuzzy Robust Nonlinear Programming Model for Stream Water Quality Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(14), pages 2913-2940, November.
    20. Ye Liu & Guohe Huang & Yanpeng Cai & Cong Dong, 2011. "An Inexact Mix-Integer Two-Stage Linear Programming Model for Supporting the Management of a Low-Carbon Energy System in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(10), pages 1-30, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:10:p:1743-:d:819375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.