Author
Listed:
- Ana D. Maldonado
(Department of Mathematics, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- María Morales
(Department of Mathematics, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Francisco Navarro
(Department of Biology and Geology, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain)
- Francisco Sánchez-Martos
(Department of Biology and Geology, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain)
- Pedro A. Aguilera
(Department of Biology and Geology, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain)
Abstract
In semiarid areas, precipitations usually appear in the form of big and brief floods, which affect the aquifer through water infiltration, causing groundwater temperature changes. These changes may have an impact on the physical, chemical and biological processes of the aquifer and, thus, modeling the groundwater temperature variations associated with stormy precipitation episodes is essential, especially since this kind of precipitation is becoming increasingly frequent in semiarid regions. In this paper, we compare the predictive performance of two popular tools in statistics and machine learning, namely Bayesian networks (BNs) and artificial neural networks (ANNs), in modeling groundwater temperature variation associated with precipitation events. More specifically, we trained a total of 2145 ANNs with different node configurations, from one to five layers. On the other hand, we trained three different BNs using different structure learning algorithms. We conclude that, while both tools are equivalent in terms of accuracy for predicting groundwater temperature drops, the computational cost associated with the estimation of Bayesian networks is significantly lower, and the resulting BN models are more versatile and allow a more detailed analysis.
Suggested Citation
Ana D. Maldonado & María Morales & Francisco Navarro & Francisco Sánchez-Martos & Pedro A. Aguilera, 2021.
"Modeling Semiarid River–Aquifer Systems with Bayesian Networks and Artificial Neural Networks,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:107-:d:713916
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:107-:d:713916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.