Author
Listed:
- Svjetlana Hess
(Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Rijeka, Studentska 2, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)
- Mirano Hess
(Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Rijeka, Studentska 2, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)
- Marko Novaselić
(Maritime Department, University of Zadar, R. Boškovića 2, 23000 Zadar, Croatia)
- Luka Grbić
(Maritime Department, University of Zadar, R. Boškovića 2, 23000 Zadar, Croatia)
Abstract
Background : This paper addresses the common question of how service providers compare to their competitors and what their competitive advantages are. It focuses on the North Adriatic ports of Trieste, Koper, Rijeka, Venice, and Ravenna, all members of the North Adriatic Ports Association, analyzing their position, size, competitiveness, and role in the container market. Methods : The research employs three distinct methods: market structure analysis using several concentration indices, the R method for ranking terminals, and aggregation of these indices to create a combined index for port performance. Results : Based on the rankings, indicators, the BCG matrix, and future development plans for each terminal, the ports are ranked as follows: Koper, Rijeka, Trieste, Venice, and Ravenna. Koper emerges as the leader, positioned in the high market share and strong growth category. This advantageous position allows Koper to efficiently attract traffic without requiring substantial investments. Conclusions : The contribution of the work is that the specific measure indices were applied, which were not used in the analysis of the North Adriatic container terminals until now. The research provides both a broad and detailed understanding of the position, role, and condition of each terminal. This insight enables stakeholders to take timely, strategic actions aimed at boosting productivity and traffic, ultimately improving their competitive standing.
Suggested Citation
Svjetlana Hess & Mirano Hess & Marko Novaselić & Luka Grbić, 2024.
"Assessment of the Position of North Adriatic Terminals in Container Market Based on Different Indices,"
Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-23, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:97-:d:1493325
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:97-:d:1493325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.