IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v8y2024i4p112-d1515173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Studying the Moderating Effects of Additive Manufacturing Best Practices Between Supply Chain Complexity and Its Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Tekalign Lemma

    (College of Engineering and Technology, Wollega University, Nekemte P.O. Box 395, Ethiopia)

  • Hirpa G. Lemu

    (Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, Norway)

  • Endalkachew Mosisa Gutema

    (College of Engineering and Technology, Wollega University, Nekemte P.O. Box 395, Ethiopia
    Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, Norway)

Abstract

Background: Supply chain performance (SCP) is impacted by complexity brought about by static and dynamic drivers. This study aims to investigate the effects of supply chain complexity (SCC) on SCP and ascertain whether additive manufacturing best practices have moderating effects on this relationship. Methods: Using data from 29 Ethiopian footwear industries and 205 respondents, the relationship established in the theoretical framework was validated using structural equation modelling (SEM). Results: The study’s findings provided several important insights. First, upstream supply chain complexity (USSCC), midstream supply chain complexity (MSSCC), and downstream supply chain complexity (DSSCC) negatively affect SCP. Second, additive manufacturing best practices have significant moderation effects between supply chain complexity and supply chain performance. Third, the negative impacts of USSCC and MSSCC on SCP are reduced at a higher level of additive manufacturing adaptation. The findings of this study also revealed that the effects of DSSCC on SCP have no difference at both low and high levels of additive manufacturing best practices. Conclusions: This work offers the first empirical investigation to which the detrimental effects of SCC on SCP are mitigated or improved through the moderating role of additive manufacturing best practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Tekalign Lemma & Hirpa G. Lemu & Endalkachew Mosisa Gutema, 2024. "Studying the Moderating Effects of Additive Manufacturing Best Practices Between Supply Chain Complexity and Its Performance," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:112-:d:1515173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/8/4/112/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/8/4/112/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thonemann, Ulrich W. & Bradley, James R., 2002. "The effect of product variety on supply-chain performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(3), pages 548-569, December.
    2. Tekalign Lemma Woldesilassiea & Hirpa G. Lemu & Endalkachew Mosisa Gutema, 2024. "Impacts of Adopting Additive Manufacturing Process on Supply Chain: Systematic Literature Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Wu, Y. & Frizelle, G. & Efstathiou, J., 2007. "A study on the cost of operational complexity in customer-supplier systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 217-229, March.
    4. Kamalini Ramdas & Mohanbir S. Sawhney, 2001. "A Cross-Functional Approach to Evaluating Multiple Line Extensions for Assembled Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 22-36, January.
    5. Archie Lockamy III & Paul Childerhouse & Stephen M. Disney & Denis R. Towill & Kevin McCormack, 2008. "The impact of process maturity and uncertainty on supply chain performance: an empirical study," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(1), pages 12-27.
    6. Bruce R Lewis & Gary F Templeton & Terry Anthony Byrd, 2005. "A methodology for construct development in MIS research," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 388-400, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao, Tiaojun & Xu, Tiantian, 2014. "Pricing and product line strategy in a supply chain with risk-averse players," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 305-315.
    2. Huang, Shui-Mu & Su, Jack C.P., 2013. "Impact of product proliferation on the reverse supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 626-639.
    3. Xiao, Tiaojun & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Cheng, T.C.E., 2014. "Product variety and channel structure strategy for a retailer-Stackelberg supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 114-124.
    4. Sivadasan, Suja & Smart, Janet & Huaccho Huatuco, Luisa & Calinescu, Anisoara, 2013. "Reducing schedule instability by identifying and omitting complexity-adding information flows at the supplier–customer interface," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 253-262.
    5. Ayd{i}n Alptekinou{g}lu & Charles J. Corbett, 2008. "Mass Customization vs. Mass Production: Variety and Price Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 204-217, August.
    6. Anocha Aribarg & Neeraj Arora, 2008. "—Interbrand Variant Overlap: Impact on Brand Preference and Portfolio Profit," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 474-491, 05-06.
    7. S Sivadasan & J Smart & L Huaccho Huatuco & A Calinescu, 2010. "Operational complexity and supplier–customer integration: case study insights and complexity rebound," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(12), pages 1709-1718, December.
    8. Sergey M. Aseev & Masakazu Katsumoto, 2020. "On Optimal Leader’s Investments Strategy in a Cyclic Model of Innovation Race with Random Inventions Times," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Heng Du & Tiaojun Xiao, 2019. "Pricing Strategies for Competing Adaptive Retailers Facing Complex Consumer Behavior: Agent-based Model," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(06), pages 1909-1939, November.
    10. Tolonen, Arto & Shahmarichatghieh, Marzieh & Harkonen, Janne & Haapasalo, Harri, 2015. "Product portfolio management – Targets and key performance indicators for product portfolio renewal over life cycle," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 468-477.
    11. Shanshan Guo & H. Sebastian Heese, 2017. "Product variety and distribution channel structure," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(12), pages 3392-3410, June.
    12. Hareer Fatima Ahmed & Amin Hosseinian-Far & Dilshad Sarwar & Rasoul Khandan, 2024. "Supply Chain Complexity and Its Impact on Knowledge Transfer: Incorporating Sustainable Supply Chain Practices in Food Supply Chain Networks," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, January.
    13. Matsushima, Noriaki & Shinohara, Ryusuke, 2014. "What factors determine the number of trading partners?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 428-441.
    14. Laura Macchion & Antonella Moretto & Federico Caniato & Pamela Danese & Andrea Vinelli, 2020. "Static supply chain complexity and sustainability practices: A multitier examination," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2679-2691, November.
    15. Germán Herrera Vidal & Jairo R. Coronado-Hernández & Claudia Minnaard, 2023. "Measuring manufacturing system complexity: a literature review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(7), pages 2865-2888, October.
    16. Eva Labro, 2004. "The Cost Effects of Component Commonality: A Literature Review Through a Management-Accounting Lens," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 358-367, June.
    17. Kirca, Ahmet H. & Randhawa, Praneet & Talay, M. Berk & Akdeniz, M. Billur, 2020. "The interactive effects of product and brand portfolio strategies on brand performance: Longitudinal evidence from the U.S. automotive industry," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 421-439.
    18. Kamalini Ramdas & Marshall Fisher & Karl Ulrich, 2003. "Managing Variety for Assembled Products: Modeling Component Systems Sharing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 142-156, November.
    19. Maher Agi & Xinghao Yan, 2020. "Greening products in a supply chain under market segmentation and different channel power structures," Post-Print hal-02898158, HAL.
    20. Palsule-Desai, Omkar D. & Tirupati, Devanath & Shah, Janat, 2015. "Product line design and positioning using add-on services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 16-33.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:112-:d:1515173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.