IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v9y2020i3p17-d391242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No Passport Required: Crossing Interdisciplinary Borders in an Australian Legal Clinic

Author

Listed:
  • Doris Bozin

    (Faculty of Business, Government and Law, University of Canberra, 2617 Canberra, Australia)

  • Allison Ballard

    (Faculty of Business, Government and Law, University of Canberra, 2617 Canberra, Australia
    Faculty of Business, Justice and Behavioural Science, Charles Sturt University, 2580 Goulburn, Australia)

  • Vicki de Prazer

    (Medical and Counselling Centre, University of Canberra, 2167 Canberra, Australia)

  • Jenny Weekes

    (Medical and Counselling Centre, University of Canberra, 2167 Canberra, Australia)

Abstract

How can disparate professions better collaborate in a legal clinic environment to improve the health and wellbeing, legal and social outcomes for patients/clients? In this paper, we explore how an intentional blurring of the boundaries between the health and legal professions in practice—between lawyers, general practitioners and psychologists, in particular—in the context of clinical legal education may result in better patient/client outcomes. We find that direct interdisciplinary professional referrals for patient/clients within a legal clinic environment can promote effective and timely therapeutic interventions for those with complex and interrelated legal and health problems. Drawing upon the literature around cross-disciplinary professional client referrals and two client case studies from a health–justice legal clinic environment in which doctors, psychologists and lawyers personally cross-refer patients with legal and health problems, we recommend some steps to break down the interdisciplinary borders so as to improve access to justice and health outcomes for vulnerable clients.

Suggested Citation

  • Doris Bozin & Allison Ballard & Vicki de Prazer & Jenny Weekes, 2020. "No Passport Required: Crossing Interdisciplinary Borders in an Australian Legal Clinic," Laws, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:9:y:2020:i:3:p:17-:d:391242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/9/3/17/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/9/3/17/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:9:y:2020:i:3:p:17-:d:391242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.